2022
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey defence phenotype mediates multiple‐predator effects in tri‐trophic food webs

Abstract: 1. The emphasis on mechanisms governing the interaction among predators (e.g. cooperation, competition or intraguild predation) has driven the understanding of multiple-predator effects on prey survival and dynamics. However, overwhelming evidence shows that prey can adaptively respond to predators, exhibiting multiple defensive phenotypes to cope with predation. Nevertheless, there is still a relatively scarce theory connecting the emergence of prey defences in complex multi-predator scenarios and their ecolo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 131 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the post-contact predation sequence, chemical defences producing unpalatability might successfully deter prey consumption and are frequently associated with visual cues that act as warning signals (i.e., aposematism). In nature, all anti-predator strategies are imperfect, as predators evolve counteracting mechanisms (e.g., tolerance to chemical defences; Fink & Brower, 1981) and all ecosystems contain multiple types of potential predators (Guariento et al, 2022). Thus, a major question in evolutionary ecology is how often anti-predator defences transition within lineages over evolutionary time (e.g., Loeffler-Henry et al, 2023), and which contexts favour single-defence specialization versus multiple anti-predator defences (e.g., McClure et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the post-contact predation sequence, chemical defences producing unpalatability might successfully deter prey consumption and are frequently associated with visual cues that act as warning signals (i.e., aposematism). In nature, all anti-predator strategies are imperfect, as predators evolve counteracting mechanisms (e.g., tolerance to chemical defences; Fink & Brower, 1981) and all ecosystems contain multiple types of potential predators (Guariento et al, 2022). Thus, a major question in evolutionary ecology is how often anti-predator defences transition within lineages over evolutionary time (e.g., Loeffler-Henry et al, 2023), and which contexts favour single-defence specialization versus multiple anti-predator defences (e.g., McClure et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%