2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prey consumption and energy transfer by marine birds in the Gulf of Alaska

Abstract: We investigated prey consumption by marine birds and their contribution to cross-shelf fluxes in the northern Gulf of Alaska. We utilized data from the North Pacific Pelagic Seabird Database for modeling energy demand and prey consumption. We found that prey consumption by marine birds was much greater over the continental shelf than it was over the basin. Over the shelf, subsurface-foraging marine birds dominated food consumption, whereas over the basin, surface-foraging birds took the most prey biomass. Dail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we were unable to discern breeders from non‐breeders, previous studies have shown that breeding birds from Tern Island (French Frigate Shoals) commuted to the West Coast of the U.S. and foraged within the study area (Hyrenbach et al ., ). During the post‐breeding season, BFAL are known to disperse broadly across the north Pacific, when they range from the Gulf of Alaska to Japan (Springer et al ., ; Hunt et al ., ; Hyrenbach, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although we were unable to discern breeders from non‐breeders, previous studies have shown that breeding birds from Tern Island (French Frigate Shoals) commuted to the West Coast of the U.S. and foraged within the study area (Hyrenbach et al ., ). During the post‐breeding season, BFAL are known to disperse broadly across the north Pacific, when they range from the Gulf of Alaska to Japan (Springer et al ., ; Hunt et al ., ; Hyrenbach, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…( Table 1). Based on Hunt et al (2005), the mean body mass for these taxa was set to 3.2, 1.1, 0.4 and 0.9 kg respectively. They were grouped in two categories according to feeding strategies: "surface feeders" for gulls and kittiwakes and "plunge and pursuit divers" for gannets and auks.…”
Section: Defining the Model Compartmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their diet regime was assumed to be composed mostly of energy-rich pelagic species and large zooplankton crustaceans (Hunt et al, 2005;Certain et al, 2011). Some marine birds are also well-known to feed largely on fisheries discards (Arcos, 2001).…”
Section: Defining the Model Compartmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish length was converted to wet weight using allometric relationships established from fish in hand (using linear regressions of logtransformed values; α < 0.05; see Supplement S1) and/or literature values (Haynes & Wigley 1969, Froese & Pauly 2010, and total energy was calculated by multiplying wet weight by a single estimate of energy density for each taxonomic group. Energy densities were either determined by bomb calorimetry (Parr 1425 semimicro calorimeter) or obtained from literature sources (Haynes & Wigley 1969, Van Pelt et al 1997, Anthony et al 2000, Hunt et al 2005, Froese & Pauly 2010; see Supplements S1, S2 & S3 for the list of sources and parameters for each species). Fish pro-cessed for calorimetric analysis were first oven-dried at 70°C until weight remained constant.…”
Section: Calculation Of Total Energymentioning
confidence: 99%