2018 IEEE 3rd Advanced Information Technology, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IAEAC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iaeac.2018.8577643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prewitt edge detection based on BM3D image denoising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Face Recognition [2] Line Edge Map Vision systems [3] DNN Machine vision [4] Multilevel Fuzzy Edge Detection (FMFED) Medical image and Robotics [5] LoG Medical Images [6] Statistical Texture Analysis [7] Roberts, Prewitt, Canny Brain Tumor Segmentation [8] Sobel Robotics, medical imaging [9] DNN Identification interpretation [10] Fractional Derivatives Optics [11] Spin Hall Effect State of forests analysis [12] Canny Satellite Images [13] Prewitt, Kirsch, LoG, morphological Object extraction [14] Fuzzy Mealtime Face Recognition [14] LoG Image processing [15] Robert, Sobel, Prewitt and Canny MRI Medical Images [16] DNN Cataract Detection [18] Canny Synthetic Aperture Radar [19] Oriented Gaussian filter Human discrimination objects [20] Prewitt Computed tomography [21] DNN Meta-materials and Meta-surfaces [22] Optical edge However, noise is a crucial problem in edge detection and contours recovery. It significantly reduces performances of high-level processing, such as image recognition and classification [1], [2], [5], [6].…”
Section: Application Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face Recognition [2] Line Edge Map Vision systems [3] DNN Machine vision [4] Multilevel Fuzzy Edge Detection (FMFED) Medical image and Robotics [5] LoG Medical Images [6] Statistical Texture Analysis [7] Roberts, Prewitt, Canny Brain Tumor Segmentation [8] Sobel Robotics, medical imaging [9] DNN Identification interpretation [10] Fractional Derivatives Optics [11] Spin Hall Effect State of forests analysis [12] Canny Satellite Images [13] Prewitt, Kirsch, LoG, morphological Object extraction [14] Fuzzy Mealtime Face Recognition [14] LoG Image processing [15] Robert, Sobel, Prewitt and Canny MRI Medical Images [16] DNN Cataract Detection [18] Canny Synthetic Aperture Radar [19] Oriented Gaussian filter Human discrimination objects [20] Prewitt Computed tomography [21] DNN Meta-materials and Meta-surfaces [22] Optical edge However, noise is a crucial problem in edge detection and contours recovery. It significantly reduces performances of high-level processing, such as image recognition and classification [1], [2], [5], [6].…”
Section: Application Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different edge extraction results obtained by applying the improved anti-noise morphology algorithm and other popular existing edge extraction algorithms such as Sobel [36,37,38,39,40], Roberts [41,42], Prewitt [43,44], and Log [45] are shown in Figure 15. There were some breakages in the extracted edges using the latter four algorithms, which led to large errors during navigation line identification processing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The navigation error can decrease from 10° by using the traditional morphology algorithm to 0.5° by using the improved anti-noise morphology. The comparison edge extraction result between the improved anti-noise morphology algorithm and the popular edge extraction algorithms such as Sobel [36][37][38][39][40], Roberts [41,42], Prewitt [43,44] and Log [45] is shown in Figure 15. There are some breakages in the extracted edges by using the later four algorithms which will lead to large error during navigation line identification processing.…”
Section: Navigation Line Extraction Using Improved Anti-noise Morpholmentioning
confidence: 99%