1970
DOI: 10.1037/h0029163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Previous sexual experience and olfactory preference for novel versus original sex partners in rats.

Abstract: Rats having different types of previous sexual history were given an experimental sex experience in which they copulated to one ejaculation or until sexually satiated; then they received a preference test for the odors from the original vs. a novel sex partner. Polygamous males preferred the novel female odor (p < .05) at both levels of satiation. Monogamous males showed no preference at either level. Vigorous males mating for the first time preferred the novel female odor (p < .01) only if satiated. Polygamou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(6 reference statements)
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Male rats neonatally castrated showed no preference for normal male odor as was shown by sham-operated males (Wylie, 1968). These experiments indicated that previous housing history had more effect on sex odor preference in females than in males (Carr, et al, 1970). Adult naive receptive females preferred nonreceptive female odors over receptive female odors, whereas immature segregated receptive females preferred the receptive female odor.…”
Section: Releaser or Signallingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Male rats neonatally castrated showed no preference for normal male odor as was shown by sham-operated males (Wylie, 1968). These experiments indicated that previous housing history had more effect on sex odor preference in females than in males (Carr, et al, 1970). Adult naive receptive females preferred nonreceptive female odors over receptive female odors, whereas immature segregated receptive females preferred the receptive female odor.…”
Section: Releaser or Signallingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, Lammers et al [14,15] showed that self-grooming is localized to the medial hypothalamus, while social grooming is localized to the lateral hypothalamus. In the present study, we found that asphyxiated ani-Weitzdoerfer/Gerstl/Pollak/Hoeger/Dreher/ Lubec Social sniffing, a type of social exploratory behavior mediated by the olfactory channel, enables the recognition of the encountered animal's individuality and allows an appropriate behavior towards the other [16][17][18][19]. Van Ree et al [11] found that social exploration (sniffing) was more frequently observed in nonisolated rats, while animals after periods of short-term isolation spent more time with actions related to contact behavior (social grooming, mounting).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Generalized body odour allows sexually experienced male rats to distinguish between receptive and non-receptive females (Carr, Loeb & Dissinger, 1965;Carr & Wylie, 1966;Wylie & Loeb, 1970a, b;Stern, 1970). Rats can also distinguish olfactorily between new and original sexual partners (Krames, 1970;Carr et al, 1970a) indicating that individuals can be recognized by their odour. Sebaceous glands are, putatively, a major source of general body odour.…”
Section: Discussion and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%