Preventive digital mental health interventions for children and young people: a review of the design and reporting of research

Abstract

Digital health interventions (DHIs) have frequently been highlighted as one way to respond to increasing levels of mental health problems in children and young people. Whilst many are developed to address existing mental health problems, there is also potential for DHIs to address prevention and early intervention. However, there are currently limitations in the design and reporting of the development, evaluation and implementation of preventive DHIs that can limit their adoption into real-world practice. This scoping review aimed to examine existing evidence-based DHI interventions and review how well the research literature described factors that researchers need to include in their study designs and reports to support real-world implementation. A search was conducted for relevant publications published from 2013 onwards. Twenty-one different interventions were identified from 30 publications, which took a universal (n = 12), selective (n = 3) and indicative (n = 15) approach to preventing poor mental health. Most interventions targeted adolescents, with only two studies including children aged ≤10 years. There was limited reporting of user co-design involvement in intervention development. Barriers and facilitators to implementation varied across the delivery settings, and only a minority reported financial costs involved in delivering the intervention. This review found that while there are continued attempts to design and evaluate DHIs for children and young people, there are several points of concern. More research is needed with younger children and those from poorer and underserved backgrounds. Co-design processes with children and young people should be recognised and reported as a necessary component within DHI research as they are an important factor in the design and development of interventions, and underpin successful adoption and implementation. Reporting the type and level of human support provided as part of the intervention is also important in enabling the sustained use and implementation of DHIs.

Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges, Populations at Risk, Implications, and Opportunities

“…Expanding access to remote telemental and telebehavioral health services is recommended, along with safe in-person care equipped to meet the varying needs of specific populations. Alternative resources may include digital mental health interventions (especially for adolescents and young adults), 138 -141 which offer potential to use data to design personalized interventions, though determining the efficacy of interventions is important. 142…”

Involvement of Indigenous young people in the design and evaluation of digital mental health interventions: a scoping review protocol

“…Studies describing interventions such as telepsychiatry and videopsychiatry without the significant use of other computerised methods (e.g. websites, online game or SMS support) will not be eligible, as these services are more closely aligned with face-to-face services than dMH services which rely on computerised systems and are designed to be less resource dependent and easily replicated to the wider population [ 52 , 53 ]. The primary treatment focus of the dMH intervention must be improvement of mental health or well-being outcomes, which include psychological distress, anxiety/stress management, suicidality, substance use and smoking, to be eligible for inclusion.…”

Knowing Well, Being Well: well-being born of understanding: Addressing Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders Amid and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Expanding access to remote telemental and telebehavioral health services is recommended, along with safe in-person care equipped to meet the varying needs of specific populations. Alternative resources may include digital mental health interventions (especially for adolescents and young adults), [138][139][140][141] which offer potential to use data to design personalized interventions, though determining the efficacy of interventions is important. 142 Finally, emergency mental health crisis support may involve encouraging people to contact helplines, and, in the face of more urgent concerns, to go to a hospital emergency department.…”