Abstract:Hearing loss (HL) can negatively impact patient–provider communication and limit access to health promotion information, which may lead to decreased preventive care utilization. Using data from the 2015 and 2018 National Health Interview Survey, we examined the association between perceived HL with and without hearing aid use with self-reported age-appropriate uptake of breast and colon cancer screening, and influenza and pneumococcal vaccination. In models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, access… Show more
“…Most of the included studies used a cohort study design (65.5%), utilizing data retrieved from national databases such as the National Health Insurance or Disability databases. Five included studies used a cross-sectional design (31%) [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and one study used a mixed-method design [ 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Pooled adjusted odds ratio estimates of breast cancer screening uptake by disability status [ 6 , 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. …”
It is well established that access to preventative care, such as breast or cervical cancer screening, can reduce morbidity and mortality. Certain groups may be missed out of these healthcare services, such as women with disabilities, as they face many access barriers due to underlying inequalities and negative attitudes. However, the data have not been reviewed on whether women with disabilities face inequalities in the uptake of these services. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in women with and without disabilities. A search was conducted in July 2021 across four databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and CINAHL. Quantitative studies comparing the uptake of breast or cervical cancer screening between women with and without disabilities were eligible. Twenty-nine studies were included, all from high-income settings. One third of the 29 studies (34.5%, n = 10) were deemed to have a high risk of bias, and the remainder a low risk of bias. The pooled estimates showed that women with disabilities have 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84) lower odds of attending breast cancer screening and have 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45–0.88) lower odds of attending cervical cancer screening, compared to women without disabilities. In conclusion, women with disabilities face disparities in receipt of preventative cancer care. There is consequently an urgent need to evaluate and improve the inclusivity of cancer screening programs and thereby prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality.
“…Most of the included studies used a cohort study design (65.5%), utilizing data retrieved from national databases such as the National Health Insurance or Disability databases. Five included studies used a cross-sectional design (31%) [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] and one study used a mixed-method design [ 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Pooled adjusted odds ratio estimates of breast cancer screening uptake by disability status [ 6 , 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. …”
It is well established that access to preventative care, such as breast or cervical cancer screening, can reduce morbidity and mortality. Certain groups may be missed out of these healthcare services, such as women with disabilities, as they face many access barriers due to underlying inequalities and negative attitudes. However, the data have not been reviewed on whether women with disabilities face inequalities in the uptake of these services. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in women with and without disabilities. A search was conducted in July 2021 across four databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and CINAHL. Quantitative studies comparing the uptake of breast or cervical cancer screening between women with and without disabilities were eligible. Twenty-nine studies were included, all from high-income settings. One third of the 29 studies (34.5%, n = 10) were deemed to have a high risk of bias, and the remainder a low risk of bias. The pooled estimates showed that women with disabilities have 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84) lower odds of attending breast cancer screening and have 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45–0.88) lower odds of attending cervical cancer screening, compared to women without disabilities. In conclusion, women with disabilities face disparities in receipt of preventative cancer care. There is consequently an urgent need to evaluate and improve the inclusivity of cancer screening programs and thereby prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality.
“…A recent investigation reported that persons with hearing loss were less likely to receive preventative care and services such as cancer screenings. 52 Hearing loss is associated with increased mental health services and emergency room utilization. 53 Persons who experienced hearing loss had 47% more inpatient hospital visits and 44% greater risk for a 30-day hospital readmission than individuals without hearing loss.…”
Introduction: The proportion of Ohioans experiencing deafness or serious difficulty hearing is higher than national estimates and is increasing over time.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the burden, risk factors, comorbidities, and financial implications of hearing loss in Ohio as well as discuss approaches to reduce the burden of hearing loss in Ohio applying the Social-Ecological Model
Methods: A narrative review was completed to summarize peer-reviewed literature on hearing loss in Ohio. The Social-Ecological Model was applied to identify approaches to reduce the burden of hearing loss in Ohio.
Results: The burden of hearing loss on health and economic well-being is substantial in Ohio. While initiatives have sought to reduce costs and increase access, barriers continue to persist impeding people’s ability to obtain needed services in Ohio. Approaches were identified on all levels of the Social-Ecological Model to address the burden of hearing loss in Ohio such as creating interventions for prevention, improving access to hearing tests and hearing aids, and changing policies that expand insurance coverage for hearing aids.
Conclusion: There is a critical need for public health-initiated programs and policies that reduce barriers and increase access to hearing related services that can be implemented on all levels of the Social-Ecological Model.
“…[7][8][9][10] They experience greater mortality and morbidity rates, often related to underscreening, underdiagnosis, and undermanagement of chronic health conditions. [11][12][13][14] Therefore, with the aging US population, minimizing and ultimately eliminating health and health care disparities is of national importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite protections, mandates, and guidelines over the years from the Americans with Disabilities Act and beyond, people with disabilities continue to face considerable health inequities . They experience greater mortality and morbidity rates, often related to underscreening, underdiagnosis, and undermanagement of chronic health conditions . Therefore, with the aging US population, minimizing and ultimately eliminating health and health care disparities is of national importance.…”
IMPORTANCE People with disabilities experience disparities in health care access and outcomes, and inaccessible health care facilities are major barriers to health care access. Methods to collect accessibility request information are needed to improve health care outcomes for patients with disabilities.OBJECTIVE To evaluate an electronic health record (EHR)-based questionnaire designed to identify accessibility requests for patients with disabilities at an eye clinic.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis cross-sectional pilot study implemented an EHR questionnaire and prospectively collected data on accessibility requests at a university-based eye clinic. The study included 55 722 patients making appointments at the Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.