2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Patients with Thrombocytopenia or with Platelet Dysfunction: A Review of the Literature

Abstract: Current guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) primary prophylaxis are based on randomized clinical trials that exclude subjects at a potentially high bleeding risk. Thus no specific recommendation/algorithm for pharmacological prophylaxis in patients with thrombocytopenia and/or platelet dysfunction is available. Because at least 25% of subjects admitted to medical departments exhibit these conditions, information on this subject is provided here to optimize their VTE prophylaxis. Low platelet number/fun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, anticoagulant prophylaxis was not being administered in 91.9 % of patients who developed VTE during their hospitalization, likely due to a concern for bleeding. While there is no evidence available from randomized control trials to establish the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in thrombocytopenic cancer patients, data do exist to show that patients with moderate or even severe thrombocytopenia can tolerate low doses of heparin or LMWH [22,24]. Since prophylactic doses of anticoagulation introduce considerably lower hemorrhagic risks than do therapeutic doses, it would seem that VTE prevention in thrombocytopenic patients is important in order to reduce VTE and the need for therapeutic anticoagulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our cohort, anticoagulant prophylaxis was not being administered in 91.9 % of patients who developed VTE during their hospitalization, likely due to a concern for bleeding. While there is no evidence available from randomized control trials to establish the safety and efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in thrombocytopenic cancer patients, data do exist to show that patients with moderate or even severe thrombocytopenia can tolerate low doses of heparin or LMWH [22,24]. Since prophylactic doses of anticoagulation introduce considerably lower hemorrhagic risks than do therapeutic doses, it would seem that VTE prevention in thrombocytopenic patients is important in order to reduce VTE and the need for therapeutic anticoagulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not use low-molecular-weight heparin as a bridging therapy, as there is a paucity of evidence to support this. (5) In conclusion, our patients had favourable outcomes with careful adjustment of warfarin dosing for their prosthetic valves in the setting of acute dengue fever with thrombocytopenia. Future studies should be undertaken to develop clinical guidelines for patients on mandatory anticoagulation who have dengue with warning signs or are at risk of bleeding, especially for those residing in endemic countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…48 In the absence of prospective randomized trials, a widely used protocol in patients with malignancyassociated thrombocytopenia who have comorbidities, but who typically require therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (eg, for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism), is to reduce therapeutic-dose anticoagulation by half if the platelet count falls below 50 3 10 9 /L, to use prophylactic dose anticoagulation if the platelet count falls below 30 3 10 9 /L, and to stop all anticoagulants if the platelet count falls below 20 3 10 9 /L. 49,50 Patients with ITP have an increased risk of thrombosis, 51 as do patients with intracranial hemorrhage undergoing neurosurgery.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%