2011
DOI: 10.1002/hed.21859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of radiation‐induced xerostomia by submandibular gland transfer

Abstract: The submandibular gland can be successfully transferred to the submental space, thus preserving salivary function and preventing radiation-induced xerostomia. The transfer of the submandibular gland can improve the QOL by alleviating xerostomia, although it did not relieve dysphagia in this study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Current strategies that prevent radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction include the use of protective medication, such as amifostine or pilocarpine (24, 27, 120), surgical relocation of the submandibular gland (215), and minimization of the radiation dose administered to the major salivary glands (43,62,153,203,206). Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy has provided a significant reduction of xerostomia, 40% of patients still develop life-long complaints (62).…”
Section: Stem Cell Therapy To Ameliorate Radiation-induced Xerostomiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current strategies that prevent radiation-induced salivary gland dysfunction include the use of protective medication, such as amifostine or pilocarpine (24, 27, 120), surgical relocation of the submandibular gland (215), and minimization of the radiation dose administered to the major salivary glands (43,62,153,203,206). Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy has provided a significant reduction of xerostomia, 40% of patients still develop life-long complaints (62).…”
Section: Stem Cell Therapy To Ameliorate Radiation-induced Xerostomiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After having read the full texts, it was found that there were 12 articles which could be summarized based on the authors, sample source, sample size, allocation and interventions in the groups; i.e., the study by Jha et al [43] and Seikaly et al [44] were considered as one study, the study by Jha et al [31], Jha et al [45] and Rieger et al [46] were considered as one study, and the studies by Liu et al [47,48,49] were viewed as one study. Finally, only 7 studies (12 articles) fulfilled the final inclusion criteria and were included in the present systematic review [31,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54]. No trials were found during gray literature search.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One debate was about the reason why the incidence of postradiation xerostomia differed in various reports, with acute postradiation xerostomia ranging from 64.7 [43] to 100% [53] and late postradiation xerostomia from 65.8 [45 ]to 100% [53]. This difference might have been caused by different total radiation doses, different follow-up periods used, objective and subjective methods in measurement, different races or even the different medical levels in various countries, which most likely influence the incidence and degree of radiation-induced xerostomia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, some studies have suggested that the submandibular glands, rather than the parotid glands, are the relevant OARs for xerostomia. 33 As most prior studies on anatomic changes during radiotherapy have focused on the GTV and parotid, we similarly focused on these targets for the purposes of comparative analysis. In future work, we will examine dosimetric changes to the submandibular gland as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%