2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Physical Training–Related Injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 246 publications
1
29
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A study quality scale was developed using elements of existing scales 3133 and methodological factors specific to this review (e.g., type of observational study design, quality of traffic exposure assessment, and quality of health outcome assessment). The scale included 17 items with a maximum possible score of 40.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study quality scale was developed using elements of existing scales 3133 and methodological factors specific to this review (e.g., type of observational study design, quality of traffic exposure assessment, and quality of health outcome assessment). The scale included 17 items with a maximum possible score of 40.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated in Table 1, running has one of the highest injury incidence rates (per 1,000 training hours), especially for novice runners. Furthermore, research conducted among military populations has found running volume to be one of the most potent risk factors for training injury 23,25,29,5759 . For instance, Abt and colleagues found running to be the most frequent cause of all injuries (23.1%) and preventable injuries (30%) among US Army Special Operations forces 59 .…”
Section: Injury Risk and Distance Runningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a study of US Army infantry trainees found that those running an average of 11 miles per week experienced a 27% higher rate of lower extremity injuries than those running 5 miles per week, and the 2-mile run test times for the two groups were similar at the end of training 58 . Studies have demonstrated that when running volume is significantly reduced, recruits reduce their injury risk substantially without negatively impacting fitness 57 . Given the relatively low HIFT injury incidence rates compared to running and the positive impact on fitness domains important for readiness, it is puzzling how these popular exercise programs among military members could be discouraged with warnings of potential injury risk while distance running is encouraged.…”
Section: Injury Risk and Distance Runningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 A major challenge to effective injury prevention practice is translating research outcomes into actions and programs that can be effectively implemented in real-world training settings. 5 Training programs designed to reduce the risk of these injuries in military training populations have shown promise 6 ; however the wide-spread implementation of these programs has not been realized. The purpose of this paper is to review critical steps in successfully developing and implementing injury prevention programs in military and civilian populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%