2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Medial Femoral Condyle Injury by Using a Slotted Cannula in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Abstract: Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the most common ligament injuries of the knee in sports medicine. The treatment of choice is anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, which requires an experienced surgeon. Complications may occur at every step of the procedure. The surgeon should be especially careful when performing the step of femoral tunnel creation. Damage to the medial femoral condyle (MFC) could occur; thus, the full functional outcome of the knee might be affected. There are many surgical t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The medial femoral condyle is carefully protected during the creation of the femoral tunnel to avoid an iatrogenic cartilage injury [17]. The graft should be inserted within the femoral tunnel, and it should be at least 15 mm in length.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Arthroscopic Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medial femoral condyle is carefully protected during the creation of the femoral tunnel to avoid an iatrogenic cartilage injury [17]. The graft should be inserted within the femoral tunnel, and it should be at least 15 mm in length.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Arthroscopic Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single-bundle reconstruction is a traditional method, and its ability to restore normal knee function, especially flexion/extension, has been confirmed in multiple studies [ 3 , 4 ], but whether single-bundle reconstruction can recover the stability of knee rotation is still controversial [ 5 , 6 ]. Double-bundle reconstruction is a relatively new method which has not only some theoretical advantages but also has challenges due to positioning of the bone tunnel and has a higher risk of femoral epicondyle and bridge fracture compared with single-bundle reconstruction [ 7 ]. Additionally, double-bundle reconstruction is not suitable for patients with intercondylar fossa stenosis and the tibial plateau with small anteroposterior diameter [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%