1974
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/139.11.893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Injury to Multiple Casualties Requiring Resuscitation Following Blood Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While reactions have been reported, the incidence and severity of such complications is less than that of not receiving blood or the risk of receiving red cells of the wrong ABO type in emergency situations. During the Vietnam War, the US Army used more than 100,000 units of uncrossmatched group O red cells without a single fatal hemolytic transfusion reaction, and noted that, at the same time, all nine fatal hemolytic transfusion reactions observed in the war occurred with the misidentification of recipients of crossmatched units of red cells or whole blood [30]. …”
Section: Support Of Initial Massive Transfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While reactions have been reported, the incidence and severity of such complications is less than that of not receiving blood or the risk of receiving red cells of the wrong ABO type in emergency situations. During the Vietnam War, the US Army used more than 100,000 units of uncrossmatched group O red cells without a single fatal hemolytic transfusion reaction, and noted that, at the same time, all nine fatal hemolytic transfusion reactions observed in the war occurred with the misidentification of recipients of crossmatched units of red cells or whole blood [30]. …”
Section: Support Of Initial Massive Transfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time required for blood-type examination and cross-matching might be longer during nights or weekends. We should also consider the following points: (i) withdrawing blood samples from a patient and then transporting them to blood transfusion services will take about 15 min, (ii) transfusing multiple trauma patients with ABO-identical RBCs instead of emergency O-type RBCs is associated with a higher risk of incompatible transfusion (wrong blood in tube) [ 9 ], and (iii) blood testing during nights or weekends by untrained staff can cause errors in blood-type judgment and in clerical work. Therefore, we should transfuse uncross-matched O-type RBCs in extreme emergencies until the blood-type is known, and then transfuse uncross-matched type-specific RBCs.…”
Section: Critical Hemorrhagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that 100,419 units of emergency O-type RBC transfusion during the Vietnam War did not cause lethal complications, while 24 patients who were transfused with cross-matched blood or type-specific blood exhibited lethal hemolytic reactions during the same period owing clerical error [ 9 ]. Dutton et al [ 16 ] have summarized 4 reports and their own results concerning the safety of uncross-matched O-type RBCs in civilian trauma patients.…”
Section: Critical Hemorrhagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risks accrue from potential incompatibility between red cell antigens and serum antibodies. In Vietnam, the US forces transfused Ͼ100,000 units of "universal donor" 25,26 supplied as O-positive whole blood 28,29 with low anti-A and anti-B titers 29 without a single fatality from transfusion reaction (I calculate the 95% upper confidence limit for a zero incidence as 3.0/100,000 units; and the 99% confidence interval as 4.6/100,000 units). 27 However, the vast majority of these were transfused in relatively young males who were unlikely to have been transfused previously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,37 It was noted in the Vietnam experience that the incidents of hemolytic transfusion reactions when using type-specific blood occurred in clusters when mass casualties were treated. 25,26,29,31 This has led to the supposition that human error induced by the need for speed and multiple simultaneous procedures and transfusions, misaligning recipients, recipients' blood samples, and donor units resulted in major incompatibilities. 29 Different considerations apply to the Rh system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%