Prevention of complications of surgical treatment of stage III-IV cystocele using light polypropylene mesh

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of study was to report the subjective and objective results of different methods of surgical treatment of cystocele using the transvaginal Mesh-system. Methodology: A prospective study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2020 comparing anterior colporrhaphy with vaginal mesh and two distinct types of vaginal wall repair sutures in the surgical treatment of cystocele. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of vaginal wall erosion complications 12 months after surgery. Secondary endpoints were anatomic outcomes, TVM-related morbidity, and patient satisfaction measured using validated questionnaires. Results: In total, 102 patients with stage III-IV cystocele and the average age of 67.2 ± 3.1 years (age range of 47–79 years old) took part in the study. Of the 102 women initially enrolled, 102 (100%) were successfully followed up 12 months after primary surgery. The primary result, the objective erosion development, was radically different in the comparison groups (1.6% against 23.5%, respectively). Analysis of the improved method of operative treatment showed a prominent level of positive, uncomplicated, surgery results of 98.4% (60/61). The anatomic success rate of recovery from cystocele was 99.9% (101/102) 12 months after surgery. Conclusion: The suggested method of restoring the anterior vaginal wall in stage III-IV isolated cystocele without signs of incomplete and complete prolapse of the uterus showed a radically positive result. The number of complications was relatively high in the comparison group, but no difference was observed in satisfaction with the anatomical results of the surgery. The percentage of the vaginal wall erosion when using a single-layer suture is 23.5%, when using a two-layer suture is 1.6%

Analysis of the Relationship Between Extragenital Factors and the Development of Genital Prolapse in Women

“…The absence of a holistic approach to addressing this issue makes it impossible to rationally identify risk groups for the occurrence of RGP and determine effective ways to prevent it [2]. This has resulted in a high number of cases of recurrent GP development after surgical intervention, with the frequency of these recurrences ranging from 30% to 72% according to various authors [3].…”

“…The assessment of the localization and nature of the defect was carried out using the classification system of K.F. Slavyansky and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), and the stage of prolapse was determined according to the POP-Q classification [3,4].…”