1993
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of CNS disease in intermediate-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: comparison of cranial radiation and intrathecal methotrexate and the importance of systemic therapy: a Childrens Cancer Group report.

Abstract: IT MTX during induction, consolidation, and maintenance provides protection from CNS relapse in patients with intermediate-risk ALL equivalent to that provided by CXRT if more intensive systemic therapy is given. The CNS relapse rate with either CXRT or IT MTX is in part dependent on the associated systemic therapy. For intermediate-risk patients less than 10 years of age, IT MTX with an intensified systemic regimen provided CNS prophylaxis comparable to that provided by CXRT, whereas older patients had fewer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, BFM-based intensive chemotherapy using extended intrathecal chemotherapy has reported lower than 5% incidence of CNS relapse. 15,[19][20][21] Similar results are seen in the I911 protocol, where an extended triple inrathecal MTX regimen with intensive systemic therapy achieved a 2% cumulative incidence of CNS relapse in the IR patients. Thus, it is likely that systemic intravenous infusions of HDMTX could not be substituted for intrathecal injections of MTX in the maintenance therapy for CNS protection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, BFM-based intensive chemotherapy using extended intrathecal chemotherapy has reported lower than 5% incidence of CNS relapse. 15,[19][20][21] Similar results are seen in the I911 protocol, where an extended triple inrathecal MTX regimen with intensive systemic therapy achieved a 2% cumulative incidence of CNS relapse in the IR patients. Thus, it is likely that systemic intravenous infusions of HDMTX could not be substituted for intrathecal injections of MTX in the maintenance therapy for CNS protection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…[15][16][17][18][19] In our study, the LR patients of L874B and L911 who received HDMTX therapy as CNS prophylaxis showed 7-9% cumulative incidence of isolated CNS relapse. However, BFM-based intensive chemotherapy using extended intrathecal chemotherapy has reported lower than 5% incidence of CNS relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Intermediate risk' patients were randomly allocated to receive standard or intensive induction/consolidation, delayed intensification (DI) or no intensification, and 18 Gy cranial irradiation or 12-weekly doses of maintenance intrathecal methotrexate on CCG-105. 14,22 'Higher risk' patients with lymphomatous features 20 were randomly allocated to LSA 2 L 2 with or without cranial irradiation, the New York (NY) I regimen, or the CCG modified BFM regimen 9 on CCG-123. 20,21 'Higher risk' patients without lymphomatous features were randomly allocated to the standard CCG regimen, NYI, or the CCG-modified BFM regimen 9 on CCG-106.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNS-directed treatment is a standard component of therapy for ALL. Evidence of a detrimental effect of prophylactic cranial irradiation on neurocognitive function in children with ALL (Cousens et al, 1988;Jankovic et al, 1994;Meadows et al, 1981) has resulted in reduction of the use of cranial irradiation and the development of chemotherapy-only protocols with the same or better rate of treatment success (Kamps et al, 2002;Tubergen et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%