“…28 " 32 Most of these studies have been retrospective and uncontrolled, and suboptimal usage of the device, rather than the device itself, may have been responsible for the increased incidence of BSI in some settings. The few randomized trials comparing needleless connection devices with standard connectors have found relative reductions in BSI rates with the use of the needleless device under study, ranging from 84% to 86%, 33,34 and the most recent CDC HICPAC guideline on prevention of IVDR BSI concludes that, "when used properly, needleless devices do not adversely affect the incidence of BSI." 18<pll) In this issue of the journal, Maragakis et al 8 describe a sharp increase in BSI rates following introduction of a new needleless connector with a positive-pressure mechanical valve designed to prevent reflux of blood into the catheter.…”