Abstract:A double blind field trial was carried out with a live attenuated bovine respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. The trial involved 530 calves, two to 10 months old, on 27 dairy farms, where respiratory problems due to bovine respiratory syncytial virus infections had been observed during the preceding year. In 17 herds either all calves were vaccinated (nine groups) or all calves received a placebo (eight groups). In 10 herds half the number of calves were vaccinated and the other half kept as non-vaccinated con… Show more
“…Field studies of early vaccination suggest that calves may be protected by either live or inactivated vaccines. In the Netherlands, Verhoeff and van Nieuwstadt (1984) gave calves two doses of vaccine before they were housed and challenged naturally, and observed a reduction of BRSV-associated disease. The calves were between two and 10 months of age when they were vaccinated but no data on the differences in the response or protection of calves with or without maternally derived antibody were given.…”
Twenty-one young calves with maternally derived antibody to bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) were divided into three groups of seven, each group balanced for BRSV antibody titre. The calves had no evidence of previous exposure to BRSV. The calves in one group were given a single dose of a monovalent modified live BRSV vaccine; the calves in the second group were given a single dose of an inactivated combined BRSV, parainfluenza virus type 3, Mannheimia haemolytica vaccine and the calves in the third group were left as unvaccinated controls. Three weeks after the single doses of vaccine, all the calves were challenged with BRSV. The clinical signs of disease were mild, and virus excretion was limited to two calves in the group given the inactivated vaccine, compared with six in the negative controls (P = 0.05) and five in the group given the live vaccine. The mean virus excretion titres after the challenge were not significantly different between the groups. There was little seroconversion before the challenge, but six of the seven calves in the group given the inactivated vaccine showed significant seroconversion within two weeks after the challenge, compared with only one calf in each of the other two groups (P = 0.015).
“…Field studies of early vaccination suggest that calves may be protected by either live or inactivated vaccines. In the Netherlands, Verhoeff and van Nieuwstadt (1984) gave calves two doses of vaccine before they were housed and challenged naturally, and observed a reduction of BRSV-associated disease. The calves were between two and 10 months of age when they were vaccinated but no data on the differences in the response or protection of calves with or without maternally derived antibody were given.…”
Twenty-one young calves with maternally derived antibody to bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) were divided into three groups of seven, each group balanced for BRSV antibody titre. The calves had no evidence of previous exposure to BRSV. The calves in one group were given a single dose of a monovalent modified live BRSV vaccine; the calves in the second group were given a single dose of an inactivated combined BRSV, parainfluenza virus type 3, Mannheimia haemolytica vaccine and the calves in the third group were left as unvaccinated controls. Three weeks after the single doses of vaccine, all the calves were challenged with BRSV. The clinical signs of disease were mild, and virus excretion was limited to two calves in the group given the inactivated vaccine, compared with six in the negative controls (P = 0.05) and five in the group given the live vaccine. The mean virus excretion titres after the challenge were not significantly different between the groups. There was little seroconversion before the challenge, but six of the seven calves in the group given the inactivated vaccine showed significant seroconversion within two weeks after the challenge, compared with only one calf in each of the other two groups (P = 0.015).
“…Most such trials have been carried out in Europe; in one excellent example involving 530 calves on 27 farms, calves on farms where all calves were vaccinated with a modified live BRSV vaccine by intramuscular route had significantly decreased rates of BRSV infection and disease, compared to farms where calves were not vaccinated. Farms where half the calves were vaccinated had significantly decreased rates of disease but not infection (Verhoeff and van Nieuwstadt, 1984).…”
Section: Vaccines For Brsvmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Because of the similarities between HRSV and BRSV, it should be possible to gain insight regarding factors that impact safety, efficacy, and duration of immunity in individuals vaccinated either in the presence or absence of circulating neutralizing antibodies using the BRSV model. Many published studies have shown that commercially available BRSV vaccines can induce protection against experimentally induced or naturally occurring BRSV disease (Durham and Hassard, 1990;Ellis et al, 2001;Van Donkersgoed et al, 1990b;Vangeel et al, 2007b;Verhoeff and van Nieuwstadt, 1984;West et al, 1999b;Xue et al, 2010).…”
Section: Vaccines For Brsvmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although BRSV vaccine ERD has been well-studied, extensive research and clinical experience indicate that BRSV vaccination can be safe and effective (Ellis et al, 1995;Ellis et al, 2005;Van Donkersgoed et al, 1990a;Vangeel et al, 2007a;Vangeel et al, 2009;Verhoeff and van Nieuwstadt, 1984;West et al, 1999b;Xue et al, 2010). In studies of resistance to experimental challenge, vaccination of calves with low or absent concentrations of serum neutralizing antibodies can protect them from virulent challenge.…”
“…Generally, only mild signs of upper respiratory tract disease were present in completely vaccinated groups following RSV infection. 61 In a recent study, an experimental inactivated RSV vaccine was compared with two live vaccines in a group of calves aged 4 to 8 months. 50 These calves had low or undetectable levels of maternal antibody to RSV.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.