2006
DOI: 10.1580/1080-6032-17.2.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness by Acetazolamide in Nepali Porters: A Double-Blind Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
12
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprising, since a recent study of porters in the Khumbu found lowland porters to be at increased risk of AMS compared with highlanders (Hillenbrandt, 2006), and it might be expected that the same would be true of HAPE. All the high altitude residents in our series had previously traveled as high as or higher than the maximum altitudes attained during their HAPE episodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is surprising, since a recent study of porters in the Khumbu found lowland porters to be at increased risk of AMS compared with highlanders (Hillenbrandt, 2006), and it might be expected that the same would be true of HAPE. All the high altitude residents in our series had previously traveled as high as or higher than the maximum altitudes attained during their HAPE episodes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…After two study authors independently assessed the full text articles we excluded from the review 10 of the studies4 21 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 included in the second of the published reviews31 (see supplementary table 1 for reasons for exclusion). Our inclusion criteria specified that trials were required to randomise participants to either acetazolamide or placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not, however, a specific requirement of the second review, and one study32 was included where all participants were given acetazolamide for three days before being randomised to intervention or placebo groups. We excluded trials that were not blinded,4 used hypobaric chambers to simulate ascent to altitude,38 or included the indigenous population (owing to the likelihood of acclimatisation) 37. One study included in the systematic review and meta-analysis by Kayser et al31 was excluded from our review because the same participants took part in both the intervention and placebo groups during two different ascents, and these were then compared with each other 40.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects on prophylaxis received one 125 mg acetazolamide tablet to be taken twice a day (35) .The dosage schedule was decided after consulting previous studies (33,34,35,3,4,5,6,19) . Tablets were administered by an appointed person who ensured the timely intake of tablets.…”
Section: Acetazolamide Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%