2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-022-03889-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention method of block withholding attack based on miners’ mining behavior in blockchain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Answer: Most current research on the game theory of mining pools facing BWH attacks uses static game methods to model two mining pools [36][37][38][39]. There are expected to be very few studies on the dynamic game of the two mining pools because when the two mining pools are modeled, there are only four situations in which the mining pool launches BWH attacks that are easy to model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Answer: Most current research on the game theory of mining pools facing BWH attacks uses static game methods to model two mining pools [36][37][38][39]. There are expected to be very few studies on the dynamic game of the two mining pools because when the two mining pools are modeled, there are only four situations in which the mining pool launches BWH attacks that are easy to model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fujita et al [38] modeled the pool selection process of miners in the two pools as an evolutionary game and found the Evolutionarily Stable States (ESSs) of the game as the solutions to take full advantage of the profits of the miners. Chen et al [39] proposed a prevention method of block withholding attack (PMBWA) based on miners' mining behavior in a blockchain to prevent the block withholding attack. Kim et al [40] proposed an evolutionary game model and solution based on the miners who confronted BHW attacks in multiple mining pools to choose which mining pool had the best profit.…”
Section: Research Progress and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within such pools, the pool manager concentrates all miners to reach a consensus and distribute the revenue in proportion to each miner’s contribution. Although mining pools provide miners with more stable revenue, there may be consensus attacks on mining pools during the consensus process [ 11 ], such as the Selfish Mining (SM) attack [ 12 ], Block Withholding (BWH) attack [ 13 ], and Fork After Withholding (FAW) attack. Consensus attacks affect the normal transactions of mining pools and provide transaction support for criminal acts such as money laundering, cyber extortion, and so on [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%