2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention and Management of Radiation-induced Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity

Abstract: Article Type:Overview Article There are nationally agreed algorithms for the investigation and management of PRD, but a lack of awareness means patients still do not get referred appropriately. This article outlines the management of radiation proctopathy and diarrhoea, and signposts other accessible resources.Finally, we provide recommendations for the management of late GI symptoms in PRD, and research in this field especially the need for high quality clinical trials.3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high counts of Roseburia associating with CRO-stratified but not PRO-stratified late symptoms support that higher proportions of these bacteria relate to decreased symptom perception by patients in the presence of clinician-perceived disease. This hypothesis is consistent with the limited clinical effectiveness of oral or topical butyrate when treating radiation enteropathy (40). Although we acknowledge the low comparative proportions of these bacteria when compared with other SCFA producers such as Faecalibacterium, the trend of patients with radiation enteropathy having higher, but dynamically decreasing, SCFA production capacity (early cohort) and significantly decreased levels of homeostatic rectal mucosa cytokines involved in mucosal barrier maintenance and microbiota regulation (colonoscopy cohort) would support this assumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The high counts of Roseburia associating with CRO-stratified but not PRO-stratified late symptoms support that higher proportions of these bacteria relate to decreased symptom perception by patients in the presence of clinician-perceived disease. This hypothesis is consistent with the limited clinical effectiveness of oral or topical butyrate when treating radiation enteropathy (40). Although we acknowledge the low comparative proportions of these bacteria when compared with other SCFA producers such as Faecalibacterium, the trend of patients with radiation enteropathy having higher, but dynamically decreasing, SCFA production capacity (early cohort) and significantly decreased levels of homeostatic rectal mucosa cytokines involved in mucosal barrier maintenance and microbiota regulation (colonoscopy cohort) would support this assumption.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The cells in the bone marrow and gastrointestinal (GI) tract are the most sensitive to radiation damage, because these cells are highly proliferative and have a low sensitivity threshold to radiation, caused by fast cellular turnover (1,44,45). Along with hematopoietic injury, GI-ARS is a serious injury that causes various clinical manifestations, from those occurring in the mouth to those in the colon and rectum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One more source of contact with myelosuppressive factors is radiation therapy, which is routinely used in oncology (up to 70% of patients with malignant tumors are treated with) as well as anti-cancer chemotherapy with cytostatics [6][7][8]. Medical use of radiation accounts for 98% of the population dose contribution from all artificial sources and represents approximately 20% of the total exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%