1988
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800751023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing wound infection after appendicectomy: A review

Abstract: An exponential increase in the number of published prospective studies reflects both a continuing interest in, and a lack of consensus on, the optimal prophylaxis of wound sepsis after appendicectomy. Review of the literature over the last 25 years leads us to emphasize both the importance of adequate study size and of stratification of the severity of the sepsis found at operation. For critical comparison of prophylactic regimens the high percentage of wound infections disclosed after discharge from hospital … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been demonstrated for appendicectomies in a number of studies. 8,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The development of pelvic sepsis following appendicectomy is an infrequent but serious complication and can be associated with significant morbidity as well as a second operative procedure, as reported by Krukowski et al 24 Jan et al 20 reports the development of pelvic collections within a week of operative procedure, 20 this is consistent with the timeframe employed in this study. The current literature demonstrates conflicting evidence with some studies suggesting that LA is associated with a higher risk of developing pelvic sepsis, 13,14,18,22 and other studies concluding that this is not significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This has been demonstrated for appendicectomies in a number of studies. 8,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] The development of pelvic sepsis following appendicectomy is an infrequent but serious complication and can be associated with significant morbidity as well as a second operative procedure, as reported by Krukowski et al 24 Jan et al 20 reports the development of pelvic collections within a week of operative procedure, 20 this is consistent with the timeframe employed in this study. The current literature demonstrates conflicting evidence with some studies suggesting that LA is associated with a higher risk of developing pelvic sepsis, 13,14,18,22 and other studies concluding that this is not significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Some authors reported that an efficient peritoneal debridement and meticulous wound closure would eliminate the need for peritoneal drainage but the use of drains would yield better results in patients with a higher risk of WI and/or fecal fistula [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis has reduced the incidence of postoperative infection in this highrisk group to <5% [52,60].…”
Section: (K) Methods Ofassuring Compliance or Ethical Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears from these studies that removal ofthe appendix, whatever its pathological state, exposes the patient to inadvertent contamination by bowel flora, thereby raising the risk of postoperative infection. For this reason several authorities have recommended antimicrobial prophylaxis for all operations for acute appendicitis [52,60].…”
Section: (K) Methods Ofassuring Compliance or Ethical Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%