2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3tb00009e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing viral infections with polymeric virus catchers: a novel nanotechnological approach to anti-viral therapy

Abstract: † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed procedures on host and virus propagation and purication and enumeration assay, synthesis of vMIPs and viMIPs have been provided. Results and discussion on the characterization of the virus imprinted particles (vMIP and viMIP), adsorbed virus infectivity study and inuence of particles on bacterial growth study. Electron micrographs of the phages used and the imprinted particles and the results of the booster dose effects have been included. See

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, MIPs generally have lower specificity and sensitivity than antibodies (Tothill, 2009). This is not to say that MIPs for viruses have not been successfully produced (Bolisay et al, 2007;Sankarakumar, 2013). Like antibodies, MIPs can be applied onto sensor systems (Ge et al, 2013;PauláGleeson, 2013), and MIP-based sensors are growing in interest to researchers because of their potential in bringing down the cost of sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of this, MIPs generally have lower specificity and sensitivity than antibodies (Tothill, 2009). This is not to say that MIPs for viruses have not been successfully produced (Bolisay et al, 2007;Sankarakumar, 2013). Like antibodies, MIPs can be applied onto sensor systems (Ge et al, 2013;PauláGleeson, 2013), and MIP-based sensors are growing in interest to researchers because of their potential in bringing down the cost of sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tong and Sankarakumar suggested the use of imprinted polymers. Accordingly, a one-stage mini-emulsion polymerization, as illustrated in Figure 17, could be used to entrap viruses instead of inhibiting their activity [150]. Notably, this method is virus-specific, depending on the imprinted polymer matching a specific virus.…”
Section: Escherichia Coli Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential differences between bulk polymerization and emulsion polymerization methods are the much lower monomer/template usage in the latter case and the addition of surfactant/stabilizer for the emulsion polymerization. Sankarakumar and Tong employed miniemulsion polymerization to prepare virus‐imprinted NPs. In this technique, the viral template, which was not soluble in imprinting polymerization mixture, was covalently attached to support NPs, and molecular imprinting was further applied on the surface of NPs using methacrylate and acrylic acid as functional monomers and EGDMA as a hydrophobic cross‐linker.…”
Section: Molecular Imprinting Of Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%