2005
DOI: 10.1007/11493785_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing Undesirable Bonds Between DNA Codewords

Abstract: Abstract. The input data for DNA computing must be encoded into the form of single or double DNA strands. As complementary parts of single strands can bind together forming a double-stranded DNA sequence, one has to impose restrictions on these sets of DNA words (=languages) to prevent them from interacting in undesirable ways. We recall a list of known properties of DNA languages which are free of certain types of undesirable bonds. Then we introduce a general framework in which we can characterize each of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the elasticity of DNA requires that codes must disallow multiple portions of a single code to bond [31,32], while chemistry requires that the codes must have balanced occurrences of letters A, T and G, C [33,34,35]. On the other hand, dipole codes have only a single pair of bonding letters, and inconsistency of mesoscale mixing allows codes to bond with even a single dipole pair [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the elasticity of DNA requires that codes must disallow multiple portions of a single code to bond [31,32], while chemistry requires that the codes must have balanced occurrences of letters A, T and G, C [33,34,35]. On the other hand, dipole codes have only a single pair of bonding letters, and inconsistency of mesoscale mixing allows codes to bond with even a single dipole pair [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…introduced a theoretical approach to the problem of designing code words. Theoretical properties of languages that avoid certain undesirable hybridizations were discussed in [14,16,18]. Based on these ideas and code-theoretic properties, a computer program for generating code words is being developed [13,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scope of the studied sequential insertion/deletion operations include insertion, shuffle, literal shuffle, deletion, bipolar deletion, scattered deletion, as well as their iterated and regulated versions. Recently, the applications of such language equations were shown in the coding theory for modelling noisy channels [8] or in the biocomputing research for characterization of sets of codewords for DNA computing [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its importance and utility became more obvious in 2003 when the inverse operation, the deletion on trajectories was independently introduced in [1,13]. Several new results have been obtained since these two reports, some rather theoretical [2][3][4], some involving applications [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%