2016
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2016.303379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing Pregnancy in High School Students: Observations From a 3-Year Longitudinal, Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract: The educational intervention had no impact on the pregnancy rate. Social media tools in pregnancy prevention programs should be adaptive to new technologies and rapidly changing adolescent preferences for these services.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other factors related to teen pregnancy are low self-esteem, feelings of abandonment and loneliness, and poor communication between the girl and her mother regarding the onset of sexual relations [ 16 ]. The latter element can have a very negative influence even when the teen girl has adequate information about birth control [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors related to teen pregnancy are low self-esteem, feelings of abandonment and loneliness, and poor communication between the girl and her mother regarding the onset of sexual relations [ 16 ]. The latter element can have a very negative influence even when the teen girl has adequate information about birth control [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, all but one teen received the full program dose as intended, and the one youth who did not receive the full dose due to a technical problem received more than 95% of the intended program content. These rates exceed those of other more time-intensive interventions in which participant attrition is a serious concern and the full program dose is not achieved for many youth (e.g., Coyle et al, 2006;Gelfond, Dierschke, Lowe, & Plastino, 2016). Additionally, while we tested the efficacy of the HEART for Teens program in a school setting, the online platform allows for flexibility in where the program is ultimately delivered, which could be at home, in a clinic setting, or via smartphone on the go.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 27 studies that were included in this review, twelve were conducted in the United States (Berglas et al, 2016;Denny & Young, 2016;LaChausse, 2006;Daley et al, 2019;Gelfond et al, 2016;Lan et al, 2019;Rohrbach et al, 2015;Markham et al, 2014;Markham et al, 2012;Rohrbach et al, 2019;Tortolero et al, 2010;Peskin et al, 2015), three in South Africa (James et al, 2006;Mason-Jones et al, 2013;Taylor et al, 2014), two in Nigeria (Esere, 2008;Mba et al, 2007), and each remaining study was conducted in Mexico (Walker et al, 2006), China (Li et al, 2011), Northern Ireland (Lohan et al, 2018), Scotland (Tucker at al., 2007), Ethiopia (Menna et al, 2015), Uganda (Musiimenta, 2012), Bangkok (Thato et al, 2008), Swaziland (Burnett et al, 2011), Northern Malawi (Mwale & Muula, 2019), and Mongolia (Cartagena et al, 2006).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that receive one weak rating is considered moderate and those that receive two or more weak ratings are considered weak. For the present review, the quality appraisal of the included studies using these rating criteria provided no studies that scored a rating of strong, 21 studies scored a rating of moderate and six studies scored a rating of weak (Cartagena et al, 2006;Denny & Young, 2016;Gelfond et al, 2016;Lan et al, 2019;Mason-Jones et al, 2013;Mba et al, 2007). The main reasons for the weak quality rating were selection bias, failure to mention whether the researcher or participants were blind to the study aims, lack of control for possible confounding variables and failure to report reliabilities and validities on outcome measures.…”
Section: Quality Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation