2018
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam7598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing loss of mechanosensation by the nuclear membranes of alveolar cells reduces lung injury in mice during mechanical ventilation

Abstract: The nuclear membrane acts as a mechanosensor that drives cellular responses following changes in the extracellular environment. Mechanically ventilated lungs are exposed to an abnormally high mechanical load that may result in clinically relevant alveolar damage. We report that mechanical ventilation in mice increased the expression of Lamin-A, a major determinant of nuclear membrane stiffness, in alveolar epithelial cells. Lamin-A expression increased and nuclear membrane compliance decreased in human bronchi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 2.5 h, animals were sacrificed and the lungs removed and fixed. There were no differences in lung injury, addressed using a semiquantitative score [9] (0.5 ± 0.5 vs 0.75 ± 0.52 for female and male animals respectively at baseline, 2.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.2 ± 1.3 for female and male animals respectively after VILI, n = 6 per condition, p < 0.001 for the effect of ventilation, p = 0.99 for the effect of sex in a two-way ANOVA). Using a more aggressive ventilatory strategy (peak pressure 20 cmH 2 O, PEEP 0 cmH 2 O, respiratory rate 50 breaths/minute, inspiratory to expiratory ratio 1:1, FiO 2 0.21) yielded slightly higher scores but again without differences between sexes (2.5 ± 1.3 vs 2.7 ± 1.3 for female and male mice, n = 3 per group, p = 0.88).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After 2.5 h, animals were sacrificed and the lungs removed and fixed. There were no differences in lung injury, addressed using a semiquantitative score [9] (0.5 ± 0.5 vs 0.75 ± 0.52 for female and male animals respectively at baseline, 2.3 ± 1.2 vs 2.2 ± 1.3 for female and male animals respectively after VILI, n = 6 per condition, p < 0.001 for the effect of ventilation, p = 0.99 for the effect of sex in a two-way ANOVA). Using a more aggressive ventilatory strategy (peak pressure 20 cmH 2 O, PEEP 0 cmH 2 O, respiratory rate 50 breaths/minute, inspiratory to expiratory ratio 1:1, FiO 2 0.21) yielded slightly higher scores but again without differences between sexes (2.5 ± 1.3 vs 2.7 ± 1.3 for female and male mice, n = 3 per group, p = 0.88).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…p values were corrected using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. These methods have been detailed elsewhere [9]. Mechanical ventilation induced significant changes in 3510 genes, irrespective of the sex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the mechanosensitive gene of early growth factor response 1 (Egr1) was also upregulated. This transcription factor was found overexpressed in mice protected from lung hyperventilation injury [32], and has an important role in the inflammatory response [33]. Accordingly, functional analysis revealed altered immune and inflammatory response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mechano‐responsive processes, lamin A and C are stress‐sensitive molecules that have been widely studied. For example, when BEAS‐2b cells are subjected to 18% equibiaxial stretch, the expression of lamin A and its ratio to lamin B expression both increase significantly, which then changes the compliance of nuclei …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when BEAS-2b cells are subjected to 18% equibiaxial stretch, the expression of lamin A and its ratio to lamin B expression both increase significantly, which then changes the compliance of nuclei. 20 Although studies have proven that different kinds of mechanical stimuli regulate lamin A/C, the detailed mechanisms involved in these processes are still unclear. Transcriptional regulation, protein synthesis, degradation and rearrangement may all participate in varying the expression of lamin A/C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%