Preventing Disparities: Bayesian and Frequentist Methods for Assessing Fairness in Machine-Learning Decision-Support Models

Abstract

Machine-learning (ML) methods are finding increasing application to guide human decision-making in many fields. Such guidance can have important consequences, including treatments and outcomes in health care. Recently, growing attention has focused on the potential that machine-learning might automatically learn unjust or discriminatory, but unrecognized or undisclosed, patterns that are manifested in available observational data and the human processes that gave rise to them, and thereby inadvertently perpetuating and propagating injustices that are embodied in the historical data. We applied two frequentist methods that have long been utilized in the courts and elsewhere for the purpose of ascertaining fairness (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and beta regression) and one Bayesian method (Bayesian Model Averaging). These methods revealed that our ML model for guiding physicians' prescribing discharge beta-blocker medication for post-coronary artery bypass patients do not manifest significant untoward race-associated disparity. The methods also showed that our ML model for directing repeat performance of MRI imaging in children with medulloblastoma did manifest racial disparities that are likely associated with ethnic differences in informed consent and desire for information in the context of serious malignancies. The relevance of these methods to ascertaining and assuring fairness in other ML-based decision-support model-development and-curation contexts is discussed.

Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction

“…Recent research pointed to the need to pay attention to bias and fairness in machine learning [101][102][103][104][105]. Some research has studied different forms of biases, some are due to the algorithms while others are due to inherent biases in the input data or in the interaction between data and algorithms [85,97,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113].…”

Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction

“…Recent research pointed to the need to pay attention to bias and fairness in machine learning [101][102][103][104][105]. Some research has studied different forms of biases, some are due to the algorithms while others are due to inherent biases in the input data or in the interaction between data and algorithms [85,97,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113].…”

Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction

“…Recent research pointed to the need to pay attention to bias and fairness in machine learning [101][102][103][104][105]. Some research has studied different forms of biases, some are due to the algorithms while others are due to inherent biases in the input data or in the interaction between data and algorithms [85,97,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113].…”

Evolution and impact of bias in human and machine learning algorithm interaction

“…Recent research pointed to the need to pay attention to bias and fairness in machine learning [101][102][103][104][105]. Some research has studied different forms of biases, some are due to the algorithms while others are due to inherent biases in the input data or in the interaction between data and algorithms [85,97,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113].…”