Preventing disease through opportunistic, rapid engagement by primary care teams using behaviour change counselling (PRE-EMPT): protocol for a general practice-based cluster randomised trial
Abstract:BackgroundSmoking, excessive alcohol consumption, lack of exercise and an unhealthy diet are the key modifiable factors contributing to premature morbidity and mortality in the developed world. Brief interventions in health care consultations can be effective in changing single health behaviours. General Practice holds considerable potential for primary prevention through modifying patients' multiple risk behaviours, but feasible, acceptable and effective interventions are poorly developed, and uptake by pract… Show more
“…The primary aim was to examine the efficacy of using such counselling during consultations by reporting the proportion of patients making changes in one or more of four behaviours: smoking, alcohol intake, eating, and exercise. 3 Although the emphasis of the PRE-EMPT trial was on how practitioners advised patients through recordings of simulated consultations by clinicians, it also provided an opportunity to study what advice was given. This article reports on an analysis of audiotaped consultations between simulated patients, and GPs and nurses, which enable a contrast between the content of smoking cessation and healthy eating consultations to be made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Twenty-nine general practices in Wales were recruited and randomised to usual care or to the intervention arm; one doctor and one nurse from each practice participated. The intervention involved clinician training in behaviour change counselling using a blended learning programme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Patients consult their GP on average 5.5 times a year 5 and, if clinicians do not engage in health promotion there is the risk that patients assume there are no concerns. 6 Smoking levels have dropped in the UK over the last decade, whereas obesity rates have risen; 2 talking about healthy diets, physical activity, and other factors relating to obesity are, therefore, a pressing challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 To improve how health professionals provide advice, researchers have adapted behaviour change techniques for healthy eating counselling, derived from motivational interviewing. 3,15 Successful use of this technique regarding reducing alcohol intake and quitting smoking suggests this approach could be used for dietary concerns. 16 However, how information is provided is unlikely to lead to significant change if there is a lack of clarity regarding what dietary changes to recommend and implement.…”
on behalf of the PRE-EMPT Team
Research Abstract BackgroundAs obesity levels increase, opportunistic behaviour change counselling from primary care clinicians in consultations about healthy eating is ever more important. However, little is known about the approaches clinicians take with patients.
AimTo describe the content of simulated consultations on healthy eating in primary care, and compare this with the content of smoking cessation consultations.
Design and settingQualitative study of 23 audiotaped simulated healthy eating and smoking cessation consultations between an actor and primary care clinicians (GPs and nurses) within a randomised controlled trial looking at behaviour change counselling.
MethodConsultations were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, then analysed inductively using thematic analysis. A thematic framework was developed by all authors and applied to the data. The content of healthy eating consultations was contrasted with that given for smoking cessation.
ResultsThere was a lack of consistency and clarity when clinicians discussed healthy eating compared with smoking; in smoking cessation consultations, the content was clearer to both the clinician and patient. There was a lack of specificity about what dietary changes should be made, how changes could be achieved, and how progress could be monitored. Barriers to change were addressed in more depth within the smoking cessation consultations than within the healthy eating encounters.
ConclusionAt present, dietary counselling by clinicians in primary care does not typically contain consistent, clear suggestions for specific change, how these could be achieved, and how progress would be monitored. This may contribute to limited uptake and efficacy of dietary counselling in primary care.
“…The primary aim was to examine the efficacy of using such counselling during consultations by reporting the proportion of patients making changes in one or more of four behaviours: smoking, alcohol intake, eating, and exercise. 3 Although the emphasis of the PRE-EMPT trial was on how practitioners advised patients through recordings of simulated consultations by clinicians, it also provided an opportunity to study what advice was given. This article reports on an analysis of audiotaped consultations between simulated patients, and GPs and nurses, which enable a contrast between the content of smoking cessation and healthy eating consultations to be made.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Twenty-nine general practices in Wales were recruited and randomised to usual care or to the intervention arm; one doctor and one nurse from each practice participated. The intervention involved clinician training in behaviour change counselling using a blended learning programme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Patients consult their GP on average 5.5 times a year 5 and, if clinicians do not engage in health promotion there is the risk that patients assume there are no concerns. 6 Smoking levels have dropped in the UK over the last decade, whereas obesity rates have risen; 2 talking about healthy diets, physical activity, and other factors relating to obesity are, therefore, a pressing challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 To improve how health professionals provide advice, researchers have adapted behaviour change techniques for healthy eating counselling, derived from motivational interviewing. 3,15 Successful use of this technique regarding reducing alcohol intake and quitting smoking suggests this approach could be used for dietary concerns. 16 However, how information is provided is unlikely to lead to significant change if there is a lack of clarity regarding what dietary changes to recommend and implement.…”
on behalf of the PRE-EMPT Team
Research Abstract BackgroundAs obesity levels increase, opportunistic behaviour change counselling from primary care clinicians in consultations about healthy eating is ever more important. However, little is known about the approaches clinicians take with patients.
AimTo describe the content of simulated consultations on healthy eating in primary care, and compare this with the content of smoking cessation consultations.
Design and settingQualitative study of 23 audiotaped simulated healthy eating and smoking cessation consultations between an actor and primary care clinicians (GPs and nurses) within a randomised controlled trial looking at behaviour change counselling.
MethodConsultations were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim, then analysed inductively using thematic analysis. A thematic framework was developed by all authors and applied to the data. The content of healthy eating consultations was contrasted with that given for smoking cessation.
ResultsThere was a lack of consistency and clarity when clinicians discussed healthy eating compared with smoking; in smoking cessation consultations, the content was clearer to both the clinician and patient. There was a lack of specificity about what dietary changes should be made, how changes could be achieved, and how progress could be monitored. Barriers to change were addressed in more depth within the smoking cessation consultations than within the healthy eating encounters.
ConclusionAt present, dietary counselling by clinicians in primary care does not typically contain consistent, clear suggestions for specific change, how these could be achieved, and how progress would be monitored. This may contribute to limited uptake and efficacy of dietary counselling in primary care.
“…105 This suggested to us that instead of focusing on generic CHD or depression risk factors, the new intervention should enable patients to specify their own goals, for instance stopping smoking or increasing social contact, so that work is directed towards outcomes important to patients.…”
BackgroundDepression is common in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) but the relationship is uncertain. In the UK, general practitioners (GPs) have been remunerated for finding depression in CHD patients; however, it is unclear how to manage these patients.ObjectivesOur aim was to explore the relationship between CHD and depression in a GP population and to develop nurse-led personalised care (PC) for patients with CHD and depression.DesignThe UPBEAT-UK study consisted of four related studies. A cohort study of patients from CHD registers to explore the relationship between CHD and depression. A metasynthesis of relevant literature and two qualitative studies [patients’ perspectives and GP/practice nurse (PN) views on management of CHD and depression] helped develop an intervention. A pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of PC was conducted.SettingThirty-three GP surgeries in south London.ParticipantsAdult patients on GP CHD registers.InterventionsFrom the qualitative studies, we developed nurse-led PC, combining case management and self-management theory. Following biopsychosocial assessment, a PC plan was devised for each patient with chest pain and depressive symptoms. Nurses helped patients address their most important related problems. Use of existing resources was promoted. Nurse time was conserved through telephone follow-up.Main outcome measuresThe main outcome of the pilot study of our newly developed PC for people with depression and CHD was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention and to decide on the best outcome measures. Depression, measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – depression subscale, and chest pain, measured by the Rose angina questionnaire, were the main outcome measures for the feasibility and cohort studies. Cardiac outcomes in the cohort study included: attendance at rapid access chest pain clinics, stent insertion, bypass graft surgery, myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Service use and costs were measured and linked to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Data for the pilot RCT were obtained by research assistants from patient interviews at baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months for the pilot RCT and at baseline and 6-monthly interviews for up to 36 months for the cohort study, using standard questionnaires.ResultsPersonalised care was acceptable to patients and proved feasible. The reporting of chest pain in the intervention group was half that of the control group at 6 months, and this reduction was maintained at 1 year. There was also a small improvement in self-efficacy measures in the intervention group at 12 months. Anxiety was more prevalent than depression in our CHD cohort over the 3 years. Nearly half of the cohort complained of chest pain at outset, with two-thirds of these being suggestive of angina. Baseline exertional chest pain (suggestive of angina), anxiety and depression were independent predictors of adverse cardiac outcome. Psychosocial factors predicted the continued reporting of exertional chest pain across the 3 years of follow-up. Costs were slightly lower for the PC group but QALYs were also lower. Neither difference was statistically significant.ConclusionsChest pain, anxiety, depression and social problems are common in patients on CHD registers in primary care and predict adverse cardiac outcomes. Together they pose a complex management problem for GPs and PNs. Our pilot trial of PC suggests a promising approach for treatment of these patients. Generalisation is limited because of the selection bias in recruitment of the practices and the subsequent participation rate of the CHD register patients, and the fact that the research took place in south London boroughs. Future work should explicitly explore methods for effective implementation of the intervention, including staff training needs and changes to practice.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN21615909.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 4, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Motivational interviewing may assist people to quit smoking. However, the results should be interpreted with caution, due to variations in study quality, treatment fidelity, between-study heterogeneity and the possibility of publication or selective reporting bias.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.