Preventable Occupational Dermatoses

Birmingham, Donald J.

doi:10.1080/00039896.1966.10664446

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1978

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various investigators [13,15,16,21] have strong objections against the concept of dual contact sensitivity. But modern dermatological textbooks [2,4] and monographs [1,11,20] still refer to a possible significance of 'dermal' contact sensitivity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Follicular Contact Dermatitis Due to Formaldehyde

Uehara¹

1978

Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

2 patients with textile contact dermatitis due to formaldehyde developed follicular, papular lesions. Histologically these papules showed eczematous changes in the follicular epidermis and mononuclear cell infiltrates in the dermis around the involved follicle. The skin between the papules was intact. It is suggested that the concept of ‘dermal’ contact sensitivity does not fit for the explanation of papular dermatitis due to formaldehyde.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Follicular Contact Dermatitis Due to Formaldehyde

Uehara¹

1978

Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Preventable Occupational Dermatoses

Cited by 1 publication

References 7 publications

Follicular Contact Dermatitis Due to Formaldehyde

Follicular Contact Dermatitis Due to Formaldehyde

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About