Preventable Deaths in Multiple Trauma Patients: The Importance of Auditing and Continuous Quality Improvement

Abstract

Background Management errors during pre-hospital care, triage process and resuscitation have been widely reported as the major source of preventable and potentially preventable deaths in multiple trauma patients. Common tools for defining whether it is a preventable, potentially preventable or non-preventable death include the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS Ò ) clinical guideline, the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS). Therefore, these surrogated scores were utilized in reviewing the study's trauma services. Methods Trauma data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018. All cases of trauma death were discussed and audited by the Hospital Trauma Committee on a regular basis. Standardized form was used to document the patient's management flow and details in every case during the meeting, and the final verdict (whether death was preventable or not) was agreed and signed by every member of the team. The reasons for the death of the patients were further classified into severe injuries, inappropriate/delayed examination, inappropriate/delayed treatment, wrong decision, insufficient supervision/guidance or lack of appropriate guidance. Results A total of 1913 trauma patients were admitted during the study period, 82 of whom were identified as major trauma (either ISS [ 15 or trauma team was activated). Among the 82 patients with major trauma, eight were trauma-related deaths, one of which was considered a preventable death and the other 7 were considered unpreventable. The decision from the hospital's performance improvement and patient safety program indicates that for every trauma patient, basic life support principles must be followed in the course of primary investigations for bedside trauma series X-ray (chest and pelvis) and FAST scan in the resuscitation room by a person who meets the criteria for trauma team activation recommended by ATLS Ò . Conclusion Mechanisms to rectify errors in the management of multiple trauma patients are essential for improving the quality of trauma care. Regular auditing in the trauma service is one of the most important parts of performance improvement and patient safety program, and it should be well established by every major trauma center in Mainland China. It can enhance the trauma management processes, decision-making skills and practical skills, thereby continuously improving quality and reducing mortality of this group of patients.

The Utility of Serum Copeptin Levels for the Determination of Injury Severity and Prognosis in Adult Patients with Multiple Blunt Trauma

“…Seventy-eight consecutive adult patients with MBT (16 females and 62 males, age range 17-92 years) due to various causes (vehicle accidents, vehiclepedestrian accidents, falling from a height, or assault) as the primary injury, and 72 age-and sex-matched healthy controls with no acute traumatic injuries, were included in the study. Adults exposed to multitrauma were first hemodynamically stabilized and a standard advanced trauma life support (ATLS) protocol was applied to each patient as suggested in the current 2018 ATLS-10 guidelines [7].…”

The Process of Regional Trauma System Development in Shenzhen, China: An 8-Year Journey

“…This has proven to be an effective way to identify de ciencies in the trauma care process, as well as to identify measures for improvement. The author's institutional study on preventable deaths in multiple trauma patients [15] was published in February 2020, and it recommended that every trauma care hospital should adopt some approach to continuously improve its trauma care, and the trauma audit meeting is one of the recommended approach. Since July 2019, this program has been introduced to other hospitals in Shenzhen and propagated to seven other hospitals in late 2019.…”

The Use of Prehospital Intensive Care Units in Emergencies—A Scoping Review

“…As the world rapidly evolves, so does the landscape of prehospital care, presenting an intricate matrix of challenges and innovations for emergency medical services (EMS) worldwide. This constant evolution is punctuated by ground-breaking treatments such as novel bleeding control practices like REBOA (resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta), the introduction of whole blood and blood products, and tranexamic acid [3][4][5][6].…”