Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review study

Abstract

IntroductionMonitoring hospital mortality rates is widely recommended. However, the number of preventable deaths remains uncertain with estimates in England ranging from 840 to 40 000 per year, these being derived from studies that identified adverse events but not whether events contributed to death or shortened life expectancy of those affected.MethodsRetrospective case record reviews of 1000 adults who died in 2009 in 10 acute hospitals in England were undertaken. Trained physician reviewers estimated life expectancy on admission, to identified problems in care contributing to death and judged if deaths were preventable taking into account patients' overall condition at that time.ResultsReviewers judged 5.2% (95% CI 3.8% to 6.6%) of deaths as having a 50% or greater chance of being preventable. The principal problems associated with preventable deaths were poor clinical monitoring (31.3%; 95% CI 23.9 to 39.7), diagnostic errors (29.7%; 95% CI 22.5% to 38.1%), and inadequate drug or fluid management (21.1%; 95% CI 14.9 to 29.0). Extrapolating from these figures suggests there would have been 11 859 (95% CI 8712 to 14 983) adult preventable deaths in hospitals in England. Most preventable deaths (60%) occurred in elderly, frail patients with multiple comorbidities judged to have had less than 1 year of life left to live.ConclusionsThe incidence of preventable hospital deaths is much lower than previous estimates. The burden of harm from preventable problems in care is still substantial. A focus on deaths may not be the most efficient approach to identify opportunities for improvement given the low proportion of deaths due to problems with healthcare.

Measuring harm and informing quality improvement in the Welsh NHS: the longitudinal Welsh national adverse events study

“…17,56,67 Information bias, moderate reliability and hindsight bias are commonly cited issues and would have influenced this study in the same ways as previous studies. This study differed from most other epidemiological studies on AEs undertaken to date in a number of ways.…”

“…Assessment of inpatient death As a decision had been made to include a large number of deceased patients in our phase 2 sample, we added a small section that is completed only for patients whose inpatient episode resulted in death. Statements were taken from the PRISM tool 20,56 in order to assess whether or not a simplified process could generate data that are benchmarkable with robust tools in identifying (1) whether or not the patient's death was caused by a problem or problems in care, (2) whether or not problems in care contributed to the patient's death and (3) whether or not there was any evidence that the death was preventable. …”

An evaluation of the first phase of Q: Engaging the founding cohort in a co-designed approach to health care improvement

“…This 7 The Health Foundation required all nominating organisations to submit standardised documentation to record the nominating process and rationale for their decisions.…”

“…However, despite some 'unmistakable progress' [5], examples of avoidable harm and poor care remain [6][7][8]. In the UK, efforts to improve quality and patient safety have had 'patchy' outcomes [9], and for the Health Foundation, strengthening quality improvement capacity and capability has been a key part of addressing the issue [10].…”

Exploring student perceptions of ward simulation as an exercise to improve decision-making skills in the clinical context

“…Adverse events can be classified into many subsets, with preventable medical error forming a key component (Leape et al, 1991). In most instances, these errors can be attributed to ineffective nontechnical skill behaviours, such as recognition of deteriorating patients or inaccurate diagnostic decision-making (Hogan et al, 2012). The non-technical skills (NTS) identified by Mellanby et al (2013) as being essential for newly qualified doctors to demonstrate include clinical decision-making, situational awareness, task management and interprofessional teamwork.…”