2012
DOI: 10.2197/ipsjjip.20.378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevent Contents Leaking in P2P CDNs with Robust and Quick Detection of Colluders

Abstract: Abstract:The objective of Peer-to-Peer Content Delivery Networks is to deliver copyrighted contents to paid clients in an efficient and secure manner. To protect such contents from being distributed to unauthorized peers, Lou and Hwang proposed a proactive content poisoning scheme to restrain an illegal download conducted by unauthorized peers, and a scheme to identify colluders who illegally leak the contents to such unauthorized peers. In this paper, we propose three schemes which extend the Lou and Hwang's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in order to apply P2P reputation systems to the colluder detection problem, we need to significantly increase the quality of colluder detection in such a way that it identifies almost all colluders without misidentifying non-colluder peers. In our previous paper [1], we introduced the notion of reputation to improve the quality of the decoy-based colluder detection scheme proposed by Lou and Hwang [10]. However, our previous scheme merely qualifies the peers to be selected as decoy and the qualification of other peers was remained open in our previous paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in order to apply P2P reputation systems to the colluder detection problem, we need to significantly increase the quality of colluder detection in such a way that it identifies almost all colluders without misidentifying non-colluder peers. In our previous paper [1], we introduced the notion of reputation to improve the quality of the decoy-based colluder detection scheme proposed by Lou and Hwang [10]. However, our previous scheme merely qualifies the peers to be selected as decoy and the qualification of other peers was remained open in our previous paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%