2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalidation of a new in vitro reconstituted human cornea model to assess the eye irritating potential of chemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CVs of some chemicals could not be calculated due to a negative mean relative viability value obtained for one or more of the labs; however, the resulting CVs were less than 103%. The values obtained in this study were equivalent to other cytotoxicity based validation studies (4 to 124%) Van Goethem et al, 2006). In addition, correlation of relative viability between labs was analyzed by Spearman's rank-correlation test (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The CVs of some chemicals could not be calculated due to a negative mean relative viability value obtained for one or more of the labs; however, the resulting CVs were less than 103%. The values obtained in this study were equivalent to other cytotoxicity based validation studies (4 to 124%) Van Goethem et al, 2006). In addition, correlation of relative viability between labs was analyzed by Spearman's rank-correlation test (Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Though the number of test chemicals was different between Van Goethem et al (2006) and our STE study, almost similar values were obtained. Therefore, the STE method has a high predictive capacity for predicting irritation category of chemicals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations