2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782010005000105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalência do complexo teníase-cisticercose na zona rural do município de Viçosa, Minas Gerais

Abstract: IIPrevalência do complexo teníase-cisticercose na zona rural do município de Viçosa, Minas GeraisPrevalence of taeniasis-cysticercosis complex in the rural area of Viçosa-MG, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from field study researches are still scarce in this country (Ferreira et al 2012). In several regions of the country, mainly in small counties, there is no inspection of pork prior to human consumption and much of the pork comes from small farms with limited technology (Iasbik et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from field study researches are still scarce in this country (Ferreira et al 2012). In several regions of the country, mainly in small counties, there is no inspection of pork prior to human consumption and much of the pork comes from small farms with limited technology (Iasbik et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on bovine cysticercosis prevalence using serological methods as diagnostic tests in Brazil are scarce and limited to local surveys. Seropositivities rates at animal level have been referred to range from 0.4% to 4.1% in surveys conducted in the state of Minas Gerais (IASBIK et al, 2010;ACEVEDO et al 2012;SANTOS et al, 2013;FELIPPE et al, 2014;GARRO et al, 2015). It seems that the herd-level prevalence could be even higher in Paraíba, once for this study only cows aged ≥ 24 months were used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Já Moralez et al 2008 Quanto à prevalência de teníase, todas (n=243) amostras de fezes humanas coletadas foram negativas para este parasito. A ausência de casos de teníase observada pode ser devido ao método de coleta das amostras de fezes (única amostra por indivíduo), corroborando com Iasbik et al (2010) e Nieto et al (2012).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified