Prevalences of sexually transmitted infections in young adults and female sex workers in Peru: a national population-based survey

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundWe assessed prevalences of seven sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Peru, stratified by risk behaviours, to help to define care and prevention priorities.MethodsIn a 2002 household-based survey of the general population, we enrolled randomly selected 18–29-year-old residents of 24 cities with populations greater than 50 000 people. We then surveyed female sex workers (FSWs) in these cities. We gathered data for sexual behaviour; vaginal specimens or urine for nucleic acid amplification tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Trichomonas vaginalis; and blood for serological tests for syphilis, HIV, and (in subsamples) herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV2) and human T-lymphotropic virus. This study is a registered component of the PREVEN trial, number ISRCTN43722548.Findings15 261 individuals from the general population and 4485 FSWs agreed to participate in our survey. Overall prevalence of infection with HSV2, weighted for city size, was 13·5% in men, 13·6% in women, and 60·6% in FSWs (all values in FSWs standardised to age composition of women in the general population). The prevalence of C trachomatis infection was 4·2% in men, 6·5% in women, and 16·4% in FSWs; of T vaginalis infection was 0·3% in men, 4·9% in women, and 7·9% in FSWs; and of syphilis was 0·5% in men, 0·4% in women, and 0·8% in FSWs. N gonorrhoeae infection had a prevalence of 0·1% in men and women, and of 1·6% in FSWs. Prevalence of HIV infection was 0·5% in men and FSWs, and 0·1% in women. Four (0·3%) of 1535 specimens were positive for human T-lymphotropic virus 1. In men, 65·0% of infections with HIV, 71·5% of N gonorrhoeae, and 41·4% of HSV2 and 60·9% of cases of syphilis were in the 13·3% who had sex with men or unprotected sex with FSWs in the past year. In women from the general population, 66·7% of infections with HIV and 16·7% of cases of syphilis were accounted for by the 4·4% who had been paid for sex by any of their past three partners.InterpretationDefining of high-risk groups could guide targeting of interventions for communicable diseases—including STIs—in the general Peruvian population.FundingWellcome Trust-Burroughs Wellcome Fund Infectious Disease Initiative and US National Institutes of Health.

Provider Attitudes Toward Oral Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Among High-Risk Men Who Have Sex with Men in Lima, Peru

“…The effectiveness of these interventions for reducing risk behavior has been demonstrated in some settings 1 but not in others, 2 and HIV incidence remains high even in settings with fully implemented condom promotion policies. In Peru, while the prevalence and incidence of HIV in the general population are only 0.5% 3 and 0.03%, 4 respectively, men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) experience rates that are comparable to those reported among heterosexual populations in sub-Saharan Africa. [5][6][7][8] As in many other settings, MSM and TGW in Peru are in great need of effective and easy to implement prevention strategies.…”

‘Just getting by’: a cross-sectional study of male sex workers as a key population for HIV/STIs among men who have sex with men in Peru

“…Peru's most recent HIV surveillance survey (2011) found a HIV prevalence of 12.4% among MSM in the capital city of Lima,1 compared with 1.0% among female sex workers (FSWs) nationwide,2 3 2.4% among clandestine FSWs in Lima4 and less than 1.0% in the country's general population 5. A study of high-risk, low-income groups from urban coastal Peru found that 10.5% of men who have sex with only men had recent syphilis infection, compared with 1.5% of heterosexual men and 2.0% of heterosexual women 6.…”

Preferencias y satisfacción hacia un programa de tamizaje con pruebas autoadministradas de deteccion del virus de papiloma humano

“…Con un nivel de confianza del 95%, una muestra de 92 personas presentó errores en las estimaciones no mayores del 10%. Sin embargo, se consideró un 8% de no respuesta en base a la experiencia en estudios previos con encuestas domiciliarias (12) , por lo que el estudio planteó finalmente la inclusión de 100 mujeres para ser encuestadas.…”