Prevalence, treatment, and the correlates of common mental disorders in the mid 2010′s in Japan: The results of the world mental health Japan 2nd survey

Ishikawa, Hanako; Tachimori, Hisateru; Takeshima, Tadashi; Umeda, Masahiro; Miyamoto, Karin; Shimoda, Haruki; Baba, Toshiaki; Kawakami, Norito

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.050

Cited by 68 publications

(92 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the proportion of mental health service use by those with serious and moderate CMD in Japan seemed to increase in the past 10 years. The treatment rates at any health care setting for serious and moderate CMD cases in the WMHJ2 (45.2% and 31.7%, respectively) improved from the rates reported in the WMHJ1, and the rates in the WMHJ2 were even close to the rates in the USA (52.3% and 34.1%, respectively) . More interestingly, our sex‐specific analysis of the treatment rates indicated a clear pattern for men but not for women.…”

Section: Cross‐national Comparison Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 76%

“…The percentage of those with any 12‐month mental disorder who had received any treatment within 12 months before the interview was greater in the WMHJ2, specifically, 27.8% (SE 4.7) in the WMHJ1 and 33.6% (SE 4.2) in the WMHJ2. The treatment rates at any health‐care setting for cases with serious and moderate CMD were greater in the WMHJ2 (45.2% and 31.7%, respectively) compared to the MWHJ1 (37.0% and 17.5%, respectively), while this pattern was not clear for mild cases (15.9% and 17.9% in the WMHJ1 and WMHJ2, respectively) . Treatment of 12‐month mental disorders according to the severity and sector of mental health services by sex is shown in Table .…”

Section: Trends Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 98%

“…The percentage of those who had received any treatment within 12 months before the interview was 5.3% (SE was not reported) in the WMHJ1 and 4.7% (SE 0.4) in the WMHJ2. The percentage of those with any 12‐month mental disorder who had received any treatment within 12 months before the interview was greater in the WMHJ2, specifically, 27.8% (SE 4.7) in the WMHJ1 and 33.6% (SE 4.2) in the WMHJ2.…”

Section: Trends Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lifetime prevalence and 12‐month prevalence of any mental disorder were 17.9% (SE 1.1) and 5.6% (SE 0.6) in the WMHJ1, and 22.0% (SE 0.8) and 5.2% (SE 0.5) in the WMHJ2, respectively . The lifetime and 12‐month prevalence of CMD in the WMHJ1 and WMHJ2 by sex are shown in Tables and , respectively.…”

Section: Trends Of the Prevalence Of Mental Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Professionals were classified into the following three sectors according to the services provided: mental health specialty (psychiatrists, psychologists, other mental health professionals in any setting), general medical care (other general medical doctor or nurse), and non‐health care (human services, such as religious provider; social worker or counselor in a non‐mental health setting; and complementary alternatives, such as Internet group, self‐help group, or alternative provider). The participants who had used any of these services within 12 months were placed in a category labeled ‘Any treatment’ while those who did not seek treatment were categorized as ‘No treatment.’…”

Section: Trends Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Prevalence of mental disorders and mental health service use in Japan

Nishi

Ishikawa

Kawakami

2019

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A high disease burden of mental disorders has been noted worldwide, including Japan. It is important to monitor mental disorder prevalence trends and the use of mental health services over time using epidemiological data and to plan appropriate policies and measures that consider mental health in each country. This review outlines the prevalence trends of common mental disorders (CMD) and the use of mental health services in Japan from the 2000s to the 2010s and compares them with those in other countries. This review clarifies that the prevalence of CMD in Japan has been relatively stable in the past decade. The 12‐month prevalence of mental health service use has increased about 1.2 times to 1.6 times in the past 10–15 years. Thus, it is very likely that the rise in mental health service use contributes to increased patient numbers. Regarding cross‐national comparison, the prevalence rate of CMD in Japan is much lower compared to rates in the USA and Europe. The 12‐month prevalence of mental health service use was also lower in Japan compared to prevalence rates in other high‐income countries. Mental health epidemiology has clarified that the prevalence of CMD worldwide has remained unchanged, even though mental health service use has increased in high‐income countries. Thus, the gap in treatment quality and prevention should be addressed in the future.

show abstract

Section: Cross‐national Comparison Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 76%

Section: Trends Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Trends Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Trends Of the Prevalence Of Mental Disordermentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Trends Of Mental Health Service Usementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Prevalence of mental disorders and mental health service use in Japan

Nishi

Ishikawa

Kawakami

2019

Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of cognitive processing therapy in Japanese patients with posttraumatic stress disorder

Takagishi

Ito

Kanie

et al. 2022

Journal of Traumatic Stress

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is one of the most widely tested evidencebased treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, most studies on CPT have been conducted in Western cultural settings. This openlabel, single-arm trial investigated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of CPT for treating Japanese patients with PTSD. A total of 25 outpatients underwent 12 CPT sessions. The primary outcome was the assessment of PTSD symptoms using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV (CAPS-IV); secondary outcomes included the assessment of subjective PTSD severity, depressive and anxiety symptoms, trauma-related cognitions, and subjective quality of life. All outcomes were evaluated at pretreatment (i.e., baseline), posttreatment, and 6-and 12-month follow-ups. On average, participants attended 13 sessions of CPT (SD = 1.38), with a completion rate of 96.0%. One serious adverse event (hospitalization) occurred. Significant within-subjects standardized mean differences in CAPS-IV scores were found from baseline to treatment completion, g = −2.28, 95% CI [−3.00, −1.56]; 6-month follow-up, g = −2.95, 95% CI [−3.79, −2.12]; and 12-month follow-up, g = −2.15, 95% CI [−2.89, −1.41]. Moderate-to-large effects, gs = −0.77 to −2.45, were found on secondary outcomes. These findings support the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of CPT in a Japanese clinical setting.Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is a manualized cognitive behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that focuses on facilitating emotional processing by restructuring trauma-related maladaptive thoughts about the meaning of the traumatic event as well as about the self, others, and/or the world (Resick et al., 2016). PTSD

show abstract

Twelve‐month treatment of mental disorders in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey

Alhabeeb

Altwaijri

Al‐Subaie

et al. 2020

Int J Methods Psych Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To estimate treatment rates of 12‐month mental disorders in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey (SNMHS). Methods The SNMHS is a face‐to‐face community epidemiological survey in a nationally representative household sample of citizens ages 15–65 in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) (n = 4,004). The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) was used to produce estimates of 12‐month prevalence and treatment of common DSM‐IV mental disorders. Results About one eighth (13.7%) of respondents with a 12‐month DSM‐IV/CIDI disorder received 12‐month treatment. The highest proportion of treatment occurred in the general medical sector (53.0%). Close to half (45.2%) of patients received treatment rated at least minimally adequate using standard treatment guidelines. Although serious disorders were significantly more likely to be treated (20.2%) than mild or moderate disorders (8.5–10.7%), no association was found between disorder severity and probability of receiving adequate treatment. Sociodemographic correlates were for the most part nonsignificant. Conclusions A high level of unmet need for treatment of mental disorders exists in KSA. Further analyses of the SNMHS data might provide insights into modifiable barriers to treatment and policy options to address the problem of unmet need for treatment.

show abstract

Prevalence, treatment, and the correlates of common mental disorders in the mid 2010′s in Japan: The results of the world mental health Japan 2nd survey

Cited by 68 publications

References 31 publications

Prevalence of mental disorders and mental health service use in Japan

Prevalence of mental disorders and mental health service use in Japan

Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of cognitive processing therapy in Japanese patients with posttraumatic stress disorder

Twelve‐month treatment of mental disorders in the Saudi National Mental Health Survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About