2020
DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201911-857oc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, Symptom Burden, and Underdiagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in a Lung Cancer Screening Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 Using this approach, these lung cancer screening studies found that between 37% and 67% of their eligible smokers had airflow limitation consistent with COPD. 1,2 In keeping with many community-based studies of high-risk smokers, they also reported that between 50% and 70% of these high-risk smokers with airflow limitation had not yet been diagnosed clinically as having COPD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,4 Using this approach, these lung cancer screening studies found that between 37% and 67% of their eligible smokers had airflow limitation consistent with COPD. 1,2 In keeping with many community-based studies of high-risk smokers, they also reported that between 50% and 70% of these high-risk smokers with airflow limitation had not yet been diagnosed clinically as having COPD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Recently published lung cancer screening programs from the United Kingdom have targeted deprived communities and included routine baseline spirometry. 1,2 Although not widely recommended, 3 advocates for screening spirometry in asymptomatic smokers have described this as a "Lung Health Check," an opportunity to identify COPD at a presymptomatic stage and basis for maintaining good lung health through targeted preventive measures. 3,4 Using this approach, these lung cancer screening studies found that between 37% and 67% of their eligible smokers had airflow limitation consistent with COPD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 610 participants had a ‘normal’ scan or had non-malignant findings that have been discussed elsewhere. 13 14 After a median follow-up of 1044 days, a total of 36 lung cancers (4.7%) were diagnosed. Of these, 17 ( 51.5% of those referred to the lung cancer clinic ) were diagnosed directly following the baseline LDCT and the remainder were diagnosed following further surveillance CT scans of indeterminate nodules in the 3-month (n=16, 17.4% of nodules in this group) or 12-month surveillance groups (n=3, 9.1% of nodules in this group).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is no defining clinical sign for AATD diagnosis, the use of targeted detection across a range of phenotypes has to be considered; this would be consistent with the more nuanced approach to screening now advocated ( Table 1 ). It is conceivable that AATD could be identified through screening for other lung pathologies; for example, if small airways disease (SAD) or emphysema were seen on a CT scan done for lung cancer screening it might trigger tests for COPD 38 and AATD. Typically cancer screening focuses on heavy smokers though, so there would be risks to this approach, mainly missing cases who have never smoked or have low smoke exposure, and in some countries questions have been raised about the cost-effectiveness of such CT based programs.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%