2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, strain identification and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolated from slaughtered pig carcasses in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
5
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no such earlier data concerning pig and cattle samples, thus, it is not possible to compare the present results. However, the studies performed in other countries showed that such food producing animals at the slaughterhouse level were also often positive for Campylobacter, although the percentage of such samples was lower than identified during the present survey, and 81 (26.0%) samples out of 311 tested were positive (2,8,19). Biasi et al (2) demonstrated that 18.9% of pig carcasses were Campylobacter-positive (37 samples tested), whereas in Belgium 17% of 383 similar samples were contaminated (8).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…There is no such earlier data concerning pig and cattle samples, thus, it is not possible to compare the present results. However, the studies performed in other countries showed that such food producing animals at the slaughterhouse level were also often positive for Campylobacter, although the percentage of such samples was lower than identified during the present survey, and 81 (26.0%) samples out of 311 tested were positive (2,8,19). Biasi et al (2) demonstrated that 18.9% of pig carcasses were Campylobacter-positive (37 samples tested), whereas in Belgium 17% of 383 similar samples were contaminated (8).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar results were obtained by Inglis et al (2004), who identified less than 1% of Campylobacter ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of cattle origin. In general, antibiotic resistance, including MAR, in Campylobacter recovered from these food-producing animals is much less frequent than in those isolated from poultry and pigs (Englen et al 2007, Rozynek et al 2008, Szygalski Biasi et al 2011. However, in the present study most of the multi-resistant isolates were of C. coli and they were predominantly found in pigs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…On the other hand, cattle, and to a lesser extent pigs, are carriers of Campylobacter bacteria; however, there is little information concerning the contamination of their carcasses at the slaughterhouse level (Bae et al 2007, Englen et al 2007). As described by many authors, pigs carry a higher proportion of C. coli than C. jejuni; however, the carcasses are not as frequently contaminated with these bacteria as compared to poultry (Qin et al 2011, Szygalski Biasi et al 2011, Quintana-Hayashi and Thakur 2012. Recently, we have shown that bovine hides and carcasses tested in Poland at the slaughterhouse level were positive for Campylobacter at 25.6% and 2.7%, respectively (Wieczorek et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no published information on tetracycline-resistant Campylobacter from pigs in other Caribbean islands. Tetracycline resistance was 100% in pig Campylobacter in Brazil (Biasi et al, 2011). On the other hand, of seven C. coli isolates from pigs, five were resistant to erythromycin, but sensitive to tetracycline (Harrow et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%