2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, risk factors and molecular characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in beef abattoirs in Gauteng, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…in a survey conducted in abattoirs in Jos, Nigeria, isolated L. monocytogenes (2.5%), L. ivanovii (33.6%), L. grayi (4.4%), and L. seeligeri (1.7%). The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes (4.6%) in the samples collected from the abattoirs in the current study is lower than reported for beef abattoirs in other countries(Takahashi et al 2007;Demaître et al 2021;Al et al 2022), ndings which may be due to differences in the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in slaughtered cattle from the farms and sanitary practices during slaughter which affect cross-contamination of carcasses by L. monocytogenes and other pathogens(Onyeka et al 2021). Contrary to our failure to detect any signi cant effect of the three variables (area, type of abattoir, and kind of sample) on the prevalence of L. monocytogenes, others have documented the impact of the regional location of abattoirs(Demaître et al 2021), type of abattoirs, HT versus LT(Onyeka et al 2021), and types of samples(Matle et al 2019;Dunka et al 2021).…”
contrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in a survey conducted in abattoirs in Jos, Nigeria, isolated L. monocytogenes (2.5%), L. ivanovii (33.6%), L. grayi (4.4%), and L. seeligeri (1.7%). The overall prevalence of L. monocytogenes (4.6%) in the samples collected from the abattoirs in the current study is lower than reported for beef abattoirs in other countries(Takahashi et al 2007;Demaître et al 2021;Al et al 2022), ndings which may be due to differences in the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in slaughtered cattle from the farms and sanitary practices during slaughter which affect cross-contamination of carcasses by L. monocytogenes and other pathogens(Onyeka et al 2021). Contrary to our failure to detect any signi cant effect of the three variables (area, type of abattoir, and kind of sample) on the prevalence of L. monocytogenes, others have documented the impact of the regional location of abattoirs(Demaître et al 2021), type of abattoirs, HT versus LT(Onyeka et al 2021), and types of samples(Matle et al 2019;Dunka et al 2021).…”
contrasting
confidence: 66%
“…On the cattle farms consisting of feedlots (n = 3), cow-calf operations (n = 10), and communal farms (n = 10) in Gauteng, South Africa, the following samples were aseptically collected as described by Onyeka et al (2021). Faecal or freshly voided faeces of individual cattle, pooled faeces from areas where cattle congregated, drinking water in troughs, feeds in feeding troughs, and silage.…”
Section: Cattle Farmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in the types and frequencies of Listeria species detected in abattoirs across countries may be partly due to the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in slaughtered cattle and sanitary practices during slaughter, which affect cross-contamination of carcasses by L. monocytogenes and other pathogens (Demaître et al 2020 ; 2021 ; Mpundu et al 2022a ; Onyeka et al 2021 ). Contrary to the lack of any significant effect of the three variables on the prevalence of L. monocytogene s in our study, others have documented the impact of the regional location of abattoirs (Demaître et al 2021 ), type of abattoirs, HT versus LT (Onyeka et al 2021 ), and types of samples (Dunka et al 2021 ; Matle et al 2019 ) on the prevalence of L. monocytogenes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cattle farms consisting of feedlots ( n = 3), cow-calf operations ( n = 10), and communal farms ( n = 10) in Gauteng, South Africa, samples were aseptically collected as described by Onyeka et al ( 2021 ). Faecal (rectal faecal grab or freshly voided faeces) of individual cattle, and environmental samples inclusive of pooled faeces from areas where cattle congregated, drinking water in troughs, feeds (grains and grass), and silage in feeding troughs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, other scholars reported higher results than the present findings such as 13.3% in Addis Ababa (Tizeta et al, 2014) from Ethiopia. In Africa, 35.1% of occurrences were reported in South Africa (Onyeka et al, 2021).…”
Section: Occurrence Of E Coli O157:h7mentioning
confidence: 99%