2003
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2003.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of unrecognized diabetes mellitus in 3266 patients scheduled for coronary angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
58
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…1-6 Taubert's study in Germany showed that 46.6% of DM patients were not diagnosed previously in high-risk CAD patients scheduled for coronary angiography. 1 A recent Chinese heart survey by Hu et al 4 showed that undiagnosed T2DM accounted for nearly 40% of all T2DM patients in hospitalized CAD patients. In our study, the rate of newly diagnosed T2DM during hospitalization was 37.0%, which is consistent with Hu's study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1-6 Taubert's study in Germany showed that 46.6% of DM patients were not diagnosed previously in high-risk CAD patients scheduled for coronary angiography. 1 A recent Chinese heart survey by Hu et al 4 showed that undiagnosed T2DM accounted for nearly 40% of all T2DM patients in hospitalized CAD patients. In our study, the rate of newly diagnosed T2DM during hospitalization was 37.0%, which is consistent with Hu's study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies also showed that coronary artery lesions and prognosis were worse in CAD patients with newly diagnosed DM than in nondiabetic patients, and were even worse compared with known DM patients because the risk factors had been poorly controlled on the basis of delayed diagnosis. [1][2][3]11,12,31 Obviously, both known DM patients and previously unrecognized DM patients should be considered to be equally important. In this study, the previously known and unknown DM patients were both included in the DM group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Type 2 diabetes was defined according to the new criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the provisional criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) [31,32,33]. Unlike in a previous study of the same cohort [34], subjects with a single test showing a high blood glucose level, in the absence of a confirmatory test, were not assigned an unequivocal diabetes status. Older age was defined by the 50th percentile of the study population.…”
Section: Study Population and Clinical Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%