2009
DOI: 10.1007/bf03346456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Y microdeletions in azoospermic and severe oligozoospermic men in Southern Italy: Application of a rapid capillary electrophoresis method

Abstract: Male infertility is correlated with several genetic and non-genetic conditions. Microdeletions of Y chromosome are one of the most frequent genetic defects associated with male infertility. Evaluating this in infertile patients is important to assess an etiological diagnosis and possible prognosis of infertility, as well as to address clinical decision during treatment of infertility by intracytoplasmatic sperm injection, where the probability of success depends on the type and the number of deleted regions (a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately 5-10% of oligospermic cases and 15-20% of azoospermic cases harbor genetic abnormalities (Dada et al, 2006). Fattoruso et al (2009) reported the frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions as 9% (12.7% in azoospermic and 4.5% in severe oligozoospermic patients). Balkan et al (2008) detected an Yq microdeletion in 1 (1.9%) of 52 azoospermic cases, which has been supported by others (Qureshi et al, 1996;Sargin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 5-10% of oligospermic cases and 15-20% of azoospermic cases harbor genetic abnormalities (Dada et al, 2006). Fattoruso et al (2009) reported the frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions as 9% (12.7% in azoospermic and 4.5% in severe oligozoospermic patients). Balkan et al (2008) detected an Yq microdeletion in 1 (1.9%) of 52 azoospermic cases, which has been supported by others (Qureshi et al, 1996;Sargin et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard procedure is based on PCR amplification of AZF specific STS primers and control markers. Although alternative methods have been proposed (19), the use of the method described in the guidelines is highly advised for its high specificity and sensibility (detection of clinically relevant deletions is close to 100%). It is worth noting that the MSY sequence and the mechanism underlying microdeletions have definitely established that a fourth AZFd region postulated by KentFirst et al (20) and considered in a popular commercial kit does not exist.…”
Section: Clinical Correlations Of Azf Deletionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, electrophoretic separation of the multiplex PCR products is labor-intensive only affording low resolution and sensitivity [Bor et al 2003]. To overcome those issues, other technologies like real-time PCR with melt curve analysis, PCR with capillary electrophoresis and microarray technology have been used to screen for AZF deletions [Buch et al 2003;Fattoruso et al 2009;Zhu et al 2008].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%