2013
DOI: 10.7439/ijbar.v4i8.440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections among HIV Patients Attending a Non -Governmental Health Facility in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria.

Abstract:

Objective: This study is designed to determine the prevalence of Urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Jos and its environs among HIV cohort. This is aimed at providing improved patient care and management.

Methods: 260 mid-stream urine samples were collected from HIV Sero-positive patients. Samples were cultured, isolates identified and antibiogram was carried out according to standard microbiological protocols.

Results: Of the 260 test samples sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings are documented in studies conducted elsewhere [10, 19]. This may be due to low income that limits the health seeking behavior of an infected individual due to expensive antimicrobials, the high cost of treatment, and unsatisfactory therapeutic options [7, 14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar findings are documented in studies conducted elsewhere [10, 19]. This may be due to low income that limits the health seeking behavior of an infected individual due to expensive antimicrobials, the high cost of treatment, and unsatisfactory therapeutic options [7, 14].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The observation of the high prevalence of UTI in this study may require the need for laboratory investigation as a criterion for the commencement of treatment in HIV-positive patients. This finding was relatively higher than reports in Gondar, Ethiopia (11.9%) [6], and Jimma, Ethiopia (10.7%), [2], but lower than studies conducted in Ebonyi State, Nigeria (93.8%) [1], Tamil Nadu, India (77.5%) [17], and Osogbo, Nigeria (23.5%) [14]. This disparity rate might be attributed to differences in sample size (small sample size might overestimate the proportion), improper collection, and processing of specimens, geographical variation, and socioeconomic conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations