2002
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.10427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of the fragile X syndrome in African‐Americans

Abstract: Since the development of a molecular diagnosis for the fragile X syndrome in the early 1990s, several population-based studies in Caucasians of mostly northern European descent have established that the prevalence is probably between one in 6,000 to one in 4,000 males in the general population. Reports of increased or decreased prevalence of the fragile X syndrome exist for a few other world populations; however, many of these are small and not population-based. We present here the final results of a 4-year st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
87
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Depending on test volume, the approximate cost for inclusion of FXS into newborn screening using FREE2 methylation analysis would be between $700,000 and $1.5 million for every 100,000 babies tested (i.e., lower cost with greater test volume). On the basis of the previously reported FM frequency range (between 1 in 2,000 and 1 in 3,600 in the general population) 14 and the fact that approximately half of all FM females will be identified using the FREE2 test, we estimate that between 21 and 38 FXS-affected individuals (and their families) will be identified for every 100,000 newborns screened.…”
Section: Projected Costs and Estimated Benefits Of Fxs Newborn Screeningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…35 Depending on test volume, the approximate cost for inclusion of FXS into newborn screening using FREE2 methylation analysis would be between $700,000 and $1.5 million for every 100,000 babies tested (i.e., lower cost with greater test volume). On the basis of the previously reported FM frequency range (between 1 in 2,000 and 1 in 3,600 in the general population) 14 and the fact that approximately half of all FM females will be identified using the FREE2 test, we estimate that between 21 and 38 FXS-affected individuals (and their families) will be identified for every 100,000 newborns screened.…”
Section: Projected Costs and Estimated Benefits Of Fxs Newborn Screeningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…300624) is the most common form of inherited intellectual disabilities (IDs), with an estimated incidence of 1 in 4000 males and 1 in 8000 females. 1,2 The molecular basis of this syndrome is mainly the expansion of an unstable region of CGG repeats in the 5¢-untranslated region of the FXS gene (FMR1). The CGG repeat of the FMR1 gene is distributed in the population in four allelic classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, there remains some uncertainty regarding the premutation allele frequencies 1,[3][4][5][6][7] due in part to lingering issues of ascertainment bias, 8 but also to real frequency differences across ethnic and regional populations. For example, in the screens of males and females in Eastern Canada, allele frequencies were estimated to be ϳ1/800 males and ϳ1/260 females.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%