2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of the 35delG mutation in deaf South Brazilian infants submitted to cochlear implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies investigating the genetic basis of HI have, however, demonstrated the presence of a range of mostly recessive mutations [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies investigating the genetic basis of HI have, however, demonstrated the presence of a range of mostly recessive mutations [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other issue emerging is the small number of tested subjects in several published works, which could affect the reliability of statistical outcomes [11,16]. In some cases, even the recessive heterozygotes have been placed in the 'connexin group,' although their deafness could not be attributed to the detected genotype [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the auditory performance of the 2 implantees demonstrates that this theoretical expectation could be clinically validated and postimplantation auditory test results showed a clear benefit of speech recognition in quiet and noise. To date, only very few reports on the outcome of cochlear implantation in patients with defined types of hereditary hearing loss have been published [da Motta et al, 2012;Henricson et al, 2012;Lai et al, 2012;Mesolella et al, 2004;Nishizaki et al, 1999;Sanggaard et al, 2008;Yamaguchi et al, 1997]. All of these describe a favourable outcome after cochlear implantation; however, it remains unclear whether this demonstrates a generally good response of this therapy in hereditary hearing loss or rather a publication bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially data on the differential prognosis of speech perception after cochlear implantation would be beneficial when counselling affected patients. However, there are just very few studies published which report the clinical details of the outcome after cochlear implantation in patients with different types of hereditary hearing loss thereby limiting the prospects of a phenotype-driven patient management [da Motta et al, 2012;Eppsteiner et al, 2012;Henricson et al, 2012;Lai et al, 2012;Mesolella et al, 2004;Nishizaki et al, 1999;Yamaguchi et al, 1997]. Besides 1 affected patient in a 6-generation MYO6 family who received a cochlear implant [Sanggaard et al, 2008], the literature lacks detailed data on the potential outcome of DFNA22 patients after cochlear implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%