2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Testicular Microlithiasis in Asymptomatic Males 0 to 19 Years Old

Abstract: The prevalence of classic testicular microlithiasis in asymptomatic boys is 2.4% and increases with age.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
60
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
60
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of THF was 2.4% in a Dutch study including 694 asymptomatic boys and young men 0 to 19 years old. The prevalence was significantly higher in the older boys compared to the youngest boys, suggesting that THF develops during childhood and puberty (Goede et al ., 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence of THF was 2.4% in a Dutch study including 694 asymptomatic boys and young men 0 to 19 years old. The prevalence was significantly higher in the older boys compared to the youngest boys, suggesting that THF develops during childhood and puberty (Goede et al ., 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence documenting that THF in all cases represents TM seems insufficient, and presence of such white spots in the testis in this study is termed THF, although usually termed TM in the literature. Usually >5 or ≥5 THF 1–3 mm of size in one transducer field (Backus et al ., 1994 & Peterson et al ., 2001) or in one testis (Goede et al ., 2009, 2010) is considered pathological. The limit of five THF per transducer field has been used uncritically as the limit for abnormally high numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of TML has increased with the development of more high‐end ultrasound machines, and perhaps also increased awareness of diagnosis of testicular cancer. TML prevalence varies considerably in studies of asymptomatic men (0.6–9.0%) (Derogee et al ., 2001; Miller & Sidhu, 2002; Kim et al ., 2003; Goede et al ., 2009) compared to symptomatic (e.g. pain, lump or swelling) men (8.7–18.1%) (Bach et al ., 2001; Middleton et al ., 2002; Deganello et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TML has been associated with carcinoma in situ and testicular cancer (Derogee et al ., 2001; Sakamoto et al ., 2006); however, not all studies have found this association (Peterson et al ., 2001; Costabile, 2007; DeCastro et al ., 2008; Goede et al ., 2009; Accardo et al ., 2015). A recent meta‐analysis including more than 35 000 men concluded that TML was significantly associated with risk of testicular cancer (Wang et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The follow-up period ranged between 8.8-61.8 months, but the meta-analysis did not report the prevalence. Although some studies have found this interrelationship [2][3][4], other investigations have questioned the association between TML and the development of testicular malignancy [5,6]. As a consequence of this controversy, the clinical management of men diagnosed with TML is car-with TML (prevalence 4.3 %) in a population of more than 20 000 men.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%