2014
DOI: 10.9734/bjmmr/2014/11242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Syphilis among Pregnant Women in Two Health Care Facilities in South Western Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have documented that screening for syphilis through ANC has not been effectively implemented due to a myriad of anecdotal factors, including the non-availability of test kits, perceived low prevalence, shortage of trained health workers and the lack of a sense of urgency by health care workers [4,913]. It is interesting to note that the programme period prevalence of 1.7% from this study is comparable with the low prevalence of syphilis among pregnant women reported from previous studies conducted in Nigeria of 0.7–1% [14,15]. Despite the relatively low prevalence found over the study period, the worsening treatment coverage in 2016 compared with 2013 is very worrying.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Several studies have documented that screening for syphilis through ANC has not been effectively implemented due to a myriad of anecdotal factors, including the non-availability of test kits, perceived low prevalence, shortage of trained health workers and the lack of a sense of urgency by health care workers [4,913]. It is interesting to note that the programme period prevalence of 1.7% from this study is comparable with the low prevalence of syphilis among pregnant women reported from previous studies conducted in Nigeria of 0.7–1% [14,15]. Despite the relatively low prevalence found over the study period, the worsening treatment coverage in 2016 compared with 2013 is very worrying.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This rate was higher than a prevalence of 0.13% reported by carried out among pregnant women in Ibadan and 0.3% rate for syphilis among Nigerian pregnant women reported by the Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) which indicated that, the national prevalence for syphilis among Nigerian pregnant women was put at such value [17,18]. Similarly, the prevalence 1.3% in this study was slightly higher than 1.0% rate reported in a study carried out among pregnant women in Osogbo [19]. Also, a lower prevalence of 0.4% when compared with the reported 1.3% detected in this study was reported among pregnant women, attending antenatal clinic in North-eastern Nigeria and 0.13% found by in Enugu, South-eastern Nigeria [20,21].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…The seroprevalence of venereal disease/syphilis in pregnancy reported in this study was 25.9% which is quite high compared to previous work conducted by Olowe our own present study of 220 cases. (Olowe OA et al , 2014). A study in Ibadan, in South Western Nigeria also reported a low prevalence of 0.13% from a study population of 2318 antenatal clinic patients (Adesina and Oladokun, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%