2013
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.02112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Supranormal Pulmonary Function Test Values Between a Military and Nonmilitary Cohort

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Supranormal spirometry was defined as an FEV 1 or FVC Ͼ 110% predicted. 15 Impulse oscillometry was also conducted as part of the evaluation before and after deployment. Oscillatory resistance was obtained by using system software (MasterScreen IOS Impulse Oscillometry, Vyaire Medical, San Diego, California).…”
Section: What This Paper Contributes To Our Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Supranormal spirometry was defined as an FEV 1 or FVC Ͼ 110% predicted. 15 Impulse oscillometry was also conducted as part of the evaluation before and after deployment. Oscillatory resistance was obtained by using system software (MasterScreen IOS Impulse Oscillometry, Vyaire Medical, San Diego, California).…”
Section: What This Paper Contributes To Our Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In swimmers, a relatively higher pulmonary function was associated with increases in the chest wall width and muscle strength [19,20]. Cochet et al [21] found that 5.5% of all patients had either a FEV 1 or FVC > 110% of the predicted value, whereas 1.5% of the patients had an FEV 1 or FVC > 120% of the predicted value; furthermore, the proportion of patients with supranormal lung function did not differ significantly between active duty military personnel and a non-active duty population of the same age range. However, even these studies did not mention patients with unusually high PFT results (≥ 140% of the predicted value), and only one suggestion was made to re-check the calibration and demographic data in such cases [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of obstructive LFI was considered when the FEV 1 /FVC ratio was <0.70 (13,17,19). For statistical purposes and subsequent analysis, subjects who did not meet the criteria for LFI and who also had FVC >100% of predicted were defined as "supra-normal" (20). At the time of examination, none of the subjects had a previous history of significant pulmonary disease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%