2020
DOI: 10.14740/jh603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Sickle Cell Trait and Rare Hemoglobin Variants in the Metropolitan Washington DC Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ethnic-racial discussions that have been raised are extremely important, especially considering the origin of SCD in sub-Saharan Africa (6) and the prevalence of cases of the disease and sickle cell trait in the black population (31) in Brazil. This fact implies a stigma that the disease has developed over a period of just over a hundred years since its first case was discovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethnic-racial discussions that have been raised are extremely important, especially considering the origin of SCD in sub-Saharan Africa (6) and the prevalence of cases of the disease and sickle cell trait in the black population (31) in Brazil. This fact implies a stigma that the disease has developed over a period of just over a hundred years since its first case was discovered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The most common sickle cell mutation is HbS (Glu6Val substitution in β-globin) followed by HbC mutation (Glu6Lys substitution in β-globin) and prevalence of sickle cell trait (SCT) is 12.5% in Washington, DC (combined HbAS and HbAC). 2 Several previous studies suggest that patients with SCD are less likely to acquire HIV-1 infection and have slower disease progression. [3][4][5] Prevalence of anti-HIV-1 but not HTLV-1 antibodies was low (2.7% versus 7.9%) in SCD patients transfused with blood that was not screened for HIV-1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables in model: NRTI, NNRTI, PI, AGE at visit, Any drug, interaction of genotype with PI 2. Variables in model: NRTI, NNRTI, PI, Any drug, interaction of genotype with NRTI 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%