2019
DOI: 10.32593/jstmu/vol1.iss1.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of sensorineural hearing loss among patients of diabetes mellitus in Southern Punjab, Pakistan

Abstract: Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common metabolic disorder with a prevalence of 11.77%. Studies report that DM can result in Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). A high prevalence of Hearing loss (HL) (43.6%) in diabetics was noted in an Indian study. In absence of local studies and a high expected prevalence, with no screening recommendations, this study was carried out to determine the prevalence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL) in Diabetes Mellitus DM in Southern Punjab. Methodology: In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12 An interesting finding noted by Yen YC et al was a threefold higher incidence in chronic otitis media cases. 13 Also a higher incidence (1.3 fold) of SSNHL has also been reported in cases with cardiac rhythm disorders, 14 Diabetes Mellitus, 15 and hypo and hyperthyroidism. 16 Here it must be kept in mind that identification of etiology is also related to the investigative facilities available and being used, which might result in difference in the frequency of different etiologies being reported from different centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… 12 An interesting finding noted by Yen YC et al was a threefold higher incidence in chronic otitis media cases. 13 Also a higher incidence (1.3 fold) of SSNHL has also been reported in cases with cardiac rhythm disorders, 14 Diabetes Mellitus, 15 and hypo and hyperthyroidism. 16 Here it must be kept in mind that identification of etiology is also related to the investigative facilities available and being used, which might result in difference in the frequency of different etiologies being reported from different centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%