2019
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1536804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of self-reported versus diagnosed dentinal hypersensitivity: a cross-sectional study and ROC curve analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DH is a ver y com mon pain ful condition characterized by acute pain. 20,21 The present study seems to be pioneer, since there is no previous study with the specific aim of measuring sensibility and specificity of pain scales for DH assessment. The scales used herein were shown to be accurate and sensitive, and should be used in further DH studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DH is a ver y com mon pain ful condition characterized by acute pain. 20,21 The present study seems to be pioneer, since there is no previous study with the specific aim of measuring sensibility and specificity of pain scales for DH assessment. The scales used herein were shown to be accurate and sensitive, and should be used in further DH studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of different factors on the prevalence of this problem has been previously studied. (13)(14)(15) Among the factors that cause dentin exposure and possible DH, dental wear (erosion) can be mentioned. In addition, the loss of periodontal tissues covering the teeth and loss of cement due to aging and periodontal disease can cause DH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population was people from 30 to 49 years old. The sample size calculation was based on the prevalence of oral health impact (15.9%), NCCL (69%), and DH (88.7%) according to previous studies [ 1 , 49 , 50 ]. The formula for estimating a proportion for finite populations n = [EDFF∗N∗p (1-p)]/[(d 2 /Z 2 1-α/2 ∗(N-1)+p∗(1-p)] was used, where EDFF is the design effect (1.2), N is the finite population (N = 2716 adults), p is the prevalence of the evaluated condition, α is the selected level of significance (95%), Z 1-α/2 is the value from the standard normal distribution holding 1- α/2 below it (Z = 1.96), and d is the margin of error (7%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%