2020
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.8904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Patients Admitted for Childbirth in Southern Connecticut

Abstract: C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
95
3
10

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
95
3
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported rates of preterm birth have ranged between 18% and 43%, and neonatal pneumonia has been documented in up to 30%, although a systematic review estimated a lower rate of 8%, 28 and many cases of neonatal respiratory infection were reported as “not due to COVID-19.” 8 , 28 The rate of preterm births is potentially higher than previously documented in MERS and SARS-CoV (27% and 25%, respectively), while IUGR rates are comparable (9% vs 9% and 13% in MERS and SARS-CoV, respectively). 9 A significant proportion of the preterm births reported in case series appear to be performed in order to protect maternal respiratory function. There were few miscarriages, stillbirths or neonatal deaths (2% or less; Tables 1 and 2 ).…”
Section: Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes Following Covid-19 Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reported rates of preterm birth have ranged between 18% and 43%, and neonatal pneumonia has been documented in up to 30%, although a systematic review estimated a lower rate of 8%, 28 and many cases of neonatal respiratory infection were reported as “not due to COVID-19.” 8 , 28 The rate of preterm births is potentially higher than previously documented in MERS and SARS-CoV (27% and 25%, respectively), while IUGR rates are comparable (9% vs 9% and 13% in MERS and SARS-CoV, respectively). 9 A significant proportion of the preterm births reported in case series appear to be performed in order to protect maternal respiratory function. There were few miscarriages, stillbirths or neonatal deaths (2% or less; Tables 1 and 2 ).…”
Section: Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes Following Covid-19 Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 In contrast to SARS and MERS, there appears to be a cohort of minimally symptomatic or even asymptomatic individuals who carry COVID-19, some of whom may be pregnant women. 9 , 10 However, due to the fact that COVID-19 pneumonia can cause rapidly progressive diffuse bilateral interstitial lung disease, there is a potentially high risk of respiratory decompensation and hypoxaemic respiratory failure in symptomatic pregnant women, 11 which likely contributes to the emerging increased risk of critical care admission in pregnant women with COVID-19. 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, while the benefits of universal SARS-CoV-2 testing on labor and delivery units to optimize staff and patient safety have been published, the impact of a universal SARS-CoV-2 testing program on maternal stress or anxiety has not been reported. [1][2][3] In addition to the toll of SARS-CoV-2 on obstetric patients' psychological experiences, health care workers exposed to SARS-CoV-2 are also at increased risk for symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress. 4 Data from past outbreaks suggest that clear communication, access to adequate personal protective equipment (PPE), and adequate rest and support may mitigate these ill effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In den Hotspot-Regionen New York City und London wiesen systematische Screeninguntersuchungen in Entbindungskliniken 7-15 % SARS-CoV-2-positive Schwangere nach, die in bis zu 89 % asymptomatisch waren [16,17]. In Regionen mit niedrigeren COVID19 Erkrankungsraten wie in Connecticut (USA) fand sich im April 2020 bei Schwangeren dagegen nur eine Prävalenz von < 3 % -wiederum über 70 % davon waren asymptomatisch [18]. Erste deutsche Daten im gleichen Zeitraum beschreiben eine vergleichbar niedrige Periodenprävalenz von 0,6 % (95 %-CI 0,01-3,1 %) [19].…”
Section: Sars-cov-2/covid-19 Prävalenz Bei Schwangerenunclassified