2013
DOI: 10.9734/bmrj/2013/4255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Salmonella Organisms in Poultry and Poultry Environments in Jamaica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result closely corroborates the 31.6%, 60% and 93.5% respectively [30,17,21]. Such high prevalence rates suggest that the birds themselves harbour the Salmonella species in their gut to considerable levels and as a consequence can be attributed to the death of birds, reduced egg and chick productivity from the stand point of animal health and also economically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result closely corroborates the 31.6%, 60% and 93.5% respectively [30,17,21]. Such high prevalence rates suggest that the birds themselves harbour the Salmonella species in their gut to considerable levels and as a consequence can be attributed to the death of birds, reduced egg and chick productivity from the stand point of animal health and also economically.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In USA, a prevalence rate of 29% was reported from poultry litter [25], Liljebjelke et al, recorded 21.8% in Georgia [19] and 2% in Jamaica [21]. However, this study recorded high (70.6%) rate of recovery of Salmonella isolates from the poultry litter/faeces sample points (E3) in Calabar.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar rate of salmonellae isolation (2%) in intensively reared chickens was reported in northern Thailand by Hanson et al (2002). Isolation rate obtained in the present study was higher compared to 0%, 0.8% and 0.83% rates reported by Curtello et al (2013) in Jamaica, Aragaw et al (2010) in Ethiopia and Ammar et al (2010) in Algeria respectively. The direct plating out method of the samples without enrichment and improved poultry hygienic conditions reported in these studies could have contributed to the lower rates.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%