2007
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa065085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Rheumatic Heart Disease Detected by Echocardiographic Screening

Abstract: Systematic screening with echocardiography, as compared with clinical screening, reveals a much higher prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (approximately 10 times as great). Since rheumatic heart disease frequently has devastating clinical consequences and secondary prevention may be effective after accurate identification of early cases, these results have important public health implications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

26
508
9
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 650 publications
(553 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
26
508
9
9
Order By: Relevance
“…No increased frequency of valvular abnormalities was observed. The value of a sensitive tool for the detection of valvular disease is underlined by the findings of recent studies in ARF, which showed that echocardiographic screening resulted in a considerably higher reported prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (almost 10 times as high) compared with clinical screening (23,24). Thus far, there are reports of the use of echocardiography only in small case series of patients with poststreptococcal ReA, with limited followup periods (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No increased frequency of valvular abnormalities was observed. The value of a sensitive tool for the detection of valvular disease is underlined by the findings of recent studies in ARF, which showed that echocardiographic screening resulted in a considerably higher reported prevalence of rheumatic heart disease (almost 10 times as high) compared with clinical screening (23,24). Thus far, there are reports of the use of echocardiography only in small case series of patients with poststreptococcal ReA, with limited followup periods (12,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, the age‐standardized prevalence of RHD in endemic countries was 444/100 000 inhabitants,3 and the inclusion of latent disease found in screening programs4, 5, 6 may increase this rate. Echocardiography is the most sensitive screening tool for early detection of latent RHD, identifying 10 times more subclinical disease when compared with auscultation 7, 8. In 2012, the World Heart Federation published a consensus document with standardized echocardiographic criteria, and screening studies have followed them since 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the prevalence of congenital heart disease in rural populations, multiple international studies [8,11,13,14] Beaton et al [14,15] compared auscultation with protocolized echocardiography in sub-Saharan Africa. This study showed a significantly higher burden of disease than expected which was attributed to the poor sensitivity of auscultation for identification of such pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%